User talk:Fastily
File:A38DriverLocationSign km415.jpg
The uploader is saying the image File:A38DriverLocationSign km415.jpg had OTRS tag on it. If yes, can you give me the OTRS ticket number and I can get the license fixed. I am an OTRS member. Or else, can you respond at User_talk:Martinvl#File_copyright_problem_with_File:A38DriverLocationSign_km415.jpg ? --Sreejith K (talk) 08:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- The permissions provided in the email were insufficient. Mr. Ward did not specify a license for the file to be relased under. Have him specify a license and I'll restore the file. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted, Why? I've made to suffer--Yswj700 (talk) 08:25, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- The documentation that I supplied two years ago were deemed sufficient then. Why then is it being rejected now? Moreover, a week ago when I saw that this image was about to be deleted, I asked for more time as I cannot contact Mr Ward at the moment. Please reinstate the image and give me two weeks to contact Mr Ward if his permission is still needed. Martinvl (talk) 12:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Negative. I'll restore it when we receive a fresh set of permissions. Frankly, I'm surprised the email was even approved at the time. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am surprised at your approach. In most societies, if a decision has been made at one level, it must be overruled at a higher level - in other words you should ask for arbcom to make a ruling, or at the very least give me a decent interval to get things together. In real life I am currently away from home on business and dio not have a chance to sort things out until Christams at the earliest. Please do the honourable thing abnd recognise that regardless of the "legalities"; this image has been in palce for two years and to remove it giving ony a weeks notice is totally unreasonable. Martinvl (talk) 07:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Again, since I obviously failed to make myself clear - send or get a fresh set of permissions sent our OTRS team, in which the copyright status of the file is explicitly stated, and I'll restore the file. If that's too difficult to do, sorry, can't help. -FASTILY (TALK) 09:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am surprised at your approach. In most societies, if a decision has been made at one level, it must be overruled at a higher level - in other words you should ask for arbcom to make a ruling, or at the very least give me a decent interval to get things together. In real life I am currently away from home on business and dio not have a chance to sort things out until Christams at the earliest. Please do the honourable thing abnd recognise that regardless of the "legalities"; this image has been in palce for two years and to remove it giving ony a weeks notice is totally unreasonable. Martinvl (talk) 07:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Negative. I'll restore it when we receive a fresh set of permissions. Frankly, I'm surprised the email was even approved at the time. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- The documentation that I supplied two years ago were deemed sufficient then. Why then is it being rejected now? Moreover, a week ago when I saw that this image was about to be deleted, I asked for more time as I cannot contact Mr Ward at the moment. Please reinstate the image and give me two weeks to contact Mr Ward if his permission is still needed. Martinvl (talk) 12:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
In order to avoid this posting being archived, I will be visiting it daily until I can contact Mr Ward and get his permission. Martinvl (talk) 17:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker)Or you can just use
{{subst:DNAU|number}}
where number represents the number of days the page should be retained on the talkpage. Simply place this right underneath the header.—cyberpower (X-Mas Chat)(Contrib.) 19:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Patrick de Napoli deleted image
Hi, I noticed that the image File:De Napoli Aarau vs GCZ.jpg was deleted due to "no evidence of permission". However, I sent two emails to permissions-en@wikimedia.org (before the deadline) quoting the image's author giving permission to use the image. I didn't receive a reply to either email, did I send them to the wrong address or has a mistake been made? I hope you can clear this up for me as this is the first time one of my images has been deleted.
Thanks in advance, Drawley (talk) 10:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- I dug around in the system and found the emails, but I still cannot restore the file I'm afraid. 'Franziska' did not specify a Wikipedia compatible free license for the file to be released under (see WP:PERMISSION and WP:DCP for details). Please try to reach the copyright holder of the photo again, and have them release the file under a Wikipedia-compatiable license. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:12, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Some assistance requested
- Category:Wikipedia files with NFUR blocks but free license
- Wikipedia:Database_reports/Files_with_conflicting_categorization
- Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Photo_of_art
It would be nice to get these cleaned up ASAP. Anything you can do assist? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yuck, yeah, I'll see what I can do to help out. Regards, FASTILY (TALK) 20:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
File you deleted 12/20/2011 named "Peter Sprague (w_twin-neck, by Michael Oletta)-6_11.jpg"
Yes, I do think you made a mistake... but perhaps the image creator's permission to post w/ CC-BY-SA 3.0 wasn't sufficiently clear (I forwarded Oletta's earlier email granting permission to <permissions-en.wikipedia.org> on 12/14/2011).
I've emailed him again a clearer, more specific request for permission, asking him to confirm that he is indeed the creator of the image (including a link to the blog post where his image appears with the caption "Photo by Michael Oletta" and a link to the Wikipedia page where the CC notice & details are spelled out. I've asked him to please reply to both me and to <permissions-en.wikipedia.org>. In the email I included the filename, to assure that when whoever reads his reply at <permissions-en.wikipedia.org> will know for which file it's giving permission.
I'm going to upload the file again under the same filename (assuming Wikipedia allows that) with the same license.
Is there anything else I need to do? As you may have guessed I'm a Wikipedia noob, trying hard to get this article on Peter Sprague finished (currently on my user page PeterSpragueDraft). Can you respond on my own Talk page talk?
Thank you. Swamissurfer (talk) 19:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swamissurfer (talk • contribs) 19:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Nothing at the moment. Let's wait for OTRS to process the emails. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:17, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
"National Karate" page deleted
Please explain why the National Karate page was deleted and how it does not fit within the same type of allowed pages for American Taekwondo Association, Combat Hapkido, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrn0074 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Did you even read?
Did you even read the talk page of Suffokate before deleting? :D Correct me if I am wrong, but you can't speedy delete a notable band, right? --Runkulis (talk) 20:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, you're right, I can't speedy a notable band. Suffokate is not a notable band so I'll delete it :D -FASTILY (TALK) 20:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- It is great that you are starting to read :) Do you even know the criterias for a band to be considered notable? I will tell you one: a band has to be under a notable label. Is Mediaskare_Records notable? They have an article on Wikipedia, right? So I believe they may be considered notable, right? Prove me that I am wrong and then you can delete the article. More reading and less deleting please, or you are not worth your admin status. Thanks. --Runkulis (talk) 20:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have give a 24hr rest from the project for the NPA/ultimatum above. The only sourcing appears to be a user-submitted site that can't qualify as an RS. The label doesn't even appear notable either, so thanks for the WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS argument. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:14, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- It is great that you are starting to read :) Do you even know the criterias for a band to be considered notable? I will tell you one: a band has to be under a notable label. Is Mediaskare_Records notable? They have an article on Wikipedia, right? So I believe they may be considered notable, right? Prove me that I am wrong and then you can delete the article. More reading and less deleting please, or you are not worth your admin status. Thanks. --Runkulis (talk) 20:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Photo deleted
My photo was deleted on Wikipedia informationj for - Ronald Myers
"Ron Myers playing a trumprt in a Mississippi corn field"
I put in for the wrong licensing/copyright listing.
I own the photo and want to change the licensing/copyright to "free listing"
I thought I changed it. Apparently it didn't go through.
I will try again — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuneteenthDOC (talk • contribs) 20:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
BT Stadium
Why did you deleate my article. Michael Numer 7 21:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)21:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninjakids2k12 (talk • contribs)
I must admit I'm curious as to why you restored this article after deletion, as you didn't specify a reason in the log. —KuyaBriBriTalk 21:12, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- I originally deleted it under G11, but I didn't feel it was a blatant advert, so I restored it. It's been listed at afd now, so feel free to voice your opinion there. -FASTILY (TALK) 22:05, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Is this revised wikipedia article about yoho better now? This is the best we have done since you gave us suggestions to improve it last time. Thanks
Extended content |
---|
==The YoHo Artist Community, Yonkers, New York== The Yoho Artist community works out of two of the former Alexander Smith Carpet Mills Historic District buildings, located at 540 and 578 Nepperhan Avenue in Yonkers, New York. This population of artists and crafters has grown to more than 60 working artists since 2005. [1] The carpet mill maintained a good reputation and solid success until the end of World War II, when, after a number of employee strikes, the city’s largest employer relocated to Greenville, Mississippi, where workers were not unionized. In the mid-1950’s the Yonkers plant shut down entirely, leaving a massive complex vacant and an estimated 5,000 workers without jobs. [3] Many of the carpet mill’s employees had put 40 or more years of their life into this company. [3] The stronghold along Nepperhan Avenue and the Saw Mill River, and within the Yonkers community, was suddenly empty. [3] Beginning of the YoHo Artist Community: In 1983, the loft buildings were listed in the National Register of Historic Places by the United States Department of the Interior. [4] Several years later, Yonkers and Eisenkraft began see the trend of artists moving out of Manhattan and into more affordable work space outside of the city. Therefore, some of the space on the fourth floor was dedicated to be used as artist studios in the early 1990’s, and was given the name YoHo, or “Yonkers’ SoHo.” [2] As artists sought larger spaces that they could afford, they were attracted to areas like Yonkers, which are within commuting distance to the traditional arts centers in SoHo and Chelsea, Manhattan. Some artists and crafters began sparsely occupying Alexander Smith and Sons Carpet Company Mills, as well as other aging buildings in Yonkers, in the early 1990’s. [5] The community has earned recognition by New York State Senator Andrea Stewart-Cousins, who deemed April 18, 2009 “YoHo Artist Studios Day.” [9]. The Mayor of the City of Yonkers, Phil Amicone, issued a Proclamation recognizing YoHo’s role in the growing artist community by dedicating a day to the community as well. [10] The YoHo community has expanded since the property’s most recent acquisition in 2005. In the beginning of 2011 the owners started incorporating 25 new spaces that would occupy a fourth floor wing. These new studios sought to add to the original 50+ studios that were already occupied at 540 and 578 Nepperhan Avenue – by this time known to be Southern Westchester’s largest artist community. [1] ==References==
|
- Better. It could still use some work, but I can see the improvement. -FASTILY (TALK) 22:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fastily, thank you for your feedback. Can you advise us what other work can be done to improve the article so we can revise appropriately? May we publish this article as it is right now and add revisions later? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HeightsRE (talk • contribs) 15:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I wouldn't recommend doing that. In its current state, the article would be deleted. Please consider asking for in-depth assistance at the help desk. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:20, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Confederate Momument, Victoria, TX IMG 1006.JPG
Hi Fastily. Checking an old deletion discussion I was participating in, I'm now wondering why this image has been deleted. I had provided three references that show how the monument in question was from 1912, so PD-1923 should have applied. See e.g. that historic photograph from 1912 where the memorial already exists. De728631 (talk) 23:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hm, I wonder how that happened. File
Restored -FASTILY (TALK) 00:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Syamsir Alam
please undelete Syamsir Alam Page, he is one of the brightest talent in Indonesian Football. played for C.A Penarol U-19 in Uruguay and Next season will play for CS. Vise in Belgium 2nd tier League. i will contribute to improve the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.136.147.130 (talk) 00:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't delete the most recent version of the page. You're probably looking for User:Mkativerata -FASTILY (TALK) 00:33, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Vandalism Warning?
I'm just curious as to why you gave me a vandalism warning? YouGaveMeAFright (talk) 00:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
USroute66 (talk · contribs). WP:DUCK. Not sure if we should give this guy a second chance or not... --Rschen7754 02:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed. I mean, Oldus66 "edited" in North Carolina, and the first edits from the new account are my talk page and something in North Carolina. –Fredddie™ 02:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Blocked -FASTILY (TALK) 03:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks again! –Fredddie™ 03:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Relevance of TAS3
I see you deleted TAS3 page. I ask you to reconsider for the following relevance reasons:
1. TAS3 is a 14M euro research project financed by EU FP7 (do you have policy that considers EU finaced projects irrelevant?). Contract number ICT-216287. Essentially TAS3 is part of European Commission's vision for future internet. 2. TAS3 is part of a broader ecosystem of EU financed projects, including Prime, PrimeLife, and Master. The members of these other projects have need to know about TAS3 and may hit wikipedia rather than TAS3 web site. 3. TAS3 has a broad european audience. Often the audience is not technical and will revert to general information gathering mechanisms, such as wikipedia, to bring up their understanding prior to meetings where they are asked to pronounce on the matter.
TAS3 is documented in several scientific publications as referenced on
http://vds1628.sivit.org/tas3/?page_id=59
I can add these references to the article if it is ressurrected.
Cheers, --Sampo sampo@synergetics.be skype chat: sampo.kellomaki
P.S. I find the Wikipedia "process" quite selfsufficient and dominated by insiders. I have never received a communication about the alteration of the status of TAS3 article. Instead, the oblique critique that causes the article to be deleted is presented in a myriad of author pages I have no knowledge about and am unlikely to encounter. Perhaps that is how Wikipedia wants to run things, but that is not likely to increase my support for Wikipedia. Quite to the contrary: I'll rather contribute to the competition (I know this statement is suicidal to ressurrection of TAS3, but I will bring my argument to the EC when I meet them (doubly suicidal argument, no doubt)).
Requesting undeletion
I'd like to request that images of coins and banknotes deleted from the article Malaysian ringgit be restored. I understand that the images were deleted because of lack of fair-use rationales. I'm willing to place rationales to those images according to the fair-use policy. Please send a reply to my talk page, thank you. — Blue。 02:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Do you have a list of files you'd like to work on? -FASTILY (TALK) 03:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I do. Would you like me to list them here or somewhere for your convenience? — Blue。 03:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please do. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I do. Would you like me to list them here or somewhere for your convenience? — Blue。 03:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Just these, because I'm not sure about the other files.
- File:Malaysia Commemorative 50 ringgit back.jpg
- File:Malaysia Commemorative 50 ringgit front.jpg
— Blue。 03:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Campustours deletion
I disagree with your interpretation that this page was "substantively identical" to the page that was deleted via AfD. Comparing the two pages they seem quite different, with the new version having references that may resolve the issues that caused it to fail its first AfD. Could you take another look and see if you still think it meets G4? Prodego talk 03:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Eh, I disagree with myself too now. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:27, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Might still be no good, but it deserves another shot. Thanks for checking it out. Cheers! Prodego talk 03:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Could you hop onto the IRC?
I was wondering if you'd be able to create a list somewhere that took all the files files with the copy to commons template on them and ranked them by the number of times that the files were used in the article space, thus allowing people to prioritize things for the upcoming drive. Theoretically, you could just have Fbot dump the list into a page on your userspace, thus avoiding a BRFA for it. (Or would it be better if I find someone with a toolserver account? Sven Manguard Wha? 03:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
P.S. I'm on the IRC now, if the above statement is confusing.
- Sure, this is definitely something I can do. I'm afraid I can't get on IRC at the moment as I'm about to sign off to attend to an appointment in RL. At any rate, I'll try to have a report for you in a day or so. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Fastily, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Fastily/TMI.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
- If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Discussion page of Istanbul Modern Art Museum
Thanks for resurrecting Istanbul Modern Art Museum. Could you also do the same for its discussion page? --Lambiam 08:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Problem of U?
Why u don't let me create full article--Jozoisis (talk) 10:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Link the article in question. It's unclear what you're referring to. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:21, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
That redirect page has to come back (required by the Creative Commons Share-alike 3.0 license; it's a pile of pre-merge edit history. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 15:21, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Donna Hill
You deleted my submission for my Donna Hill article saying it already exists. I clicked on the link and was brought to a blank editing page. I am still searching for a Donna Hill article and am coming up empty. I cannot find it anywhere. Please assist.
Thanks TinaRichell (talk) 17:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
comics articles
I noticed you G3d a bunch of comic articles. The same editor has created a bunch more. I proded them because I didn't think they met CSD, but you might want to nuke them, and perhaps the editor needs a more formal warning (I will do a twinkle warning as well) Gaijin42 (talk) 17:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Could you specify the username of the editor in question? Thanks, FASTILY (TALK) 20:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- User_talk:Deshawn0908 Gaijin42 (talk) 20:56, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Deletion
Hello! I assume that this was accidental. That's a personal sandbox, in which my most recent test involved redirecting to a Commons image. I've restored and blanked the page (so it shouldn't appear on the list again). Sorry for neglecting to do the latter in the first place. :) —David Levy 19:20, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks for letting me know; sorry for the inconvenience. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:25, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Article & I'm trying to understand why
Hi, I had submitted an article about a specialty men's company (Crazy 4 Money Clips). The reason stated that it was deleted because it had been deleted before. However, I'm not clear why it was deleted prior. I can rework the article or do more interviews with owners, etc...I'm not sure if you can still see the original article after deletion, but I was looking for a bit of guidance. Thank you for your reply.
Deslie (talk) 19:25, 22 December 2011 (UTC)D
- The page, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crazy 4 Money Clips, was deleted as a declined WP:AFC submission. Feel free to resubmit I guess, but as far as I can tell, this article is not acceptable for Wikipedia. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:28, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Article & I'm trying to understand why Kenn Kweder
Hi, I had submitted an article on Kenn Kweder. The reason stated that it was deleted because it had promotional information and did not comply with Wiki rules on spam / promotional. I used a prior Kenn Kweder template as a starting point to write a legitimate article on this artist. The mistake I made was saving part of the prior template, which was clearly promotional in nature, before finishing all my changes. Otherwise, if I had just saved the template as a sandbox, and then changed it, it would never have been flagged. I spent about two-three hours last night researching and making changes to this article to make it as legitimate as possible in the time available - and plan on further augmenting the article. Further, no offense, but did you even look at my rebuttal to the original speedy deletion notice and/or the changes I made. Apparently not, or you would have realized that the article had been cleaned up. Please place the article back in circulation as it is a legitimate article, or point to reasons other than the original "Promotional" flag, for submitting Kenn Kweder for speedy deletion. BTW, I have been nominated for wiki reviewer in the past and do not make specious claims whatsoever, as you may judge from my wiki page. If you are worried about Kenn Kweder's notability, please note that AllMusic rated Kweder at least as notable as Bootsie Barnes and Shirley Scott - each of whom have wiki pages, Kweder would have been signed to Arista by Clive Davis and was recruited as much as other well-known "New Wave" bands such as Television - except he poured a pitcher of beer on Davis when he went to see him in concert. Kweder is an important and well known part of the late 70s, early 80s renaissance of Philadelphia area music, which culminated in the national exposure of The Hooters, and which some 30 years later should be documented (on wiki preferably) for all audiophiles and lovers of diverse music. Thank You. 10stone5 (talk) 21:20, 22 December 2011 (UTC)D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.93.249.2 (talk)
IKB deletion proposal
− Hello Fastily; sorry for the delay, but I'm not online at the moment. The picture I uploaded originally had a copyright justification. The painting is not 'blue', but a patented colour using a unique binding method that in the flesh is utterly unlike any other blue you're likely to see. Klein himself patented this invention. This is his most famous conceptual series, and as such should be included on the page about him. Versions of this picture are in museums all over the world, and whilst many still hate these works, they are quite clearly notable. As for wether or not the image is copyrightable, I'm none too sure, but my original justification should be reinstated if it is deemed copyrightable; the work should definitely not be deleted. Anyhow, just a quick reply. Current market value is around $2.7 (http://www.christies.com/LotFinder/lot_details.aspx?intObjectID=5147475), and examples can be seen at the Tate Modern, London, Pompidou Paris and MOMA New York just for starters. (http://www.moma.org/collection/object.php?object_id=80103http://www.moma.org/collection/object.php?object_id=80103) best etc, Francis Elliott.Franciselliott (talk) 21:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Q LIVE ONE
Jimfbleak approved the article and found it neutral after serveral changes. So I am not sure why you deleted it for the site. Rsp tx (talk) 23:20, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Why my page get deleted? I am not advertising
Hi, Fastily,
I created page called OpenVReg, which is a open source design and pin to pin compatible Power IC design. I think this is significant progress in current IC industry, since most IC company protect each and sue others via patent law. To do so, they need to claim uniq ic design from other, which makes variety of power ICs with similar function on the market. While this OpenVReg is a pin-to-pin compatible power IC design standard, majorly driven by NVIDIA. I am one of the engineers that create this ideas. OpenVReg shares patents across companies, which is so called Open Source design. It is just lunched and have 14 major companies joined. I got some bad ass on the wikepedia saying my page about OpenVReg is advertising, which is not a truth. OpenVReg do not need ads. Companies just adopted if they want to. But I do not know to solve this issue. I want to record my work of OpenVReg on wiki. Do you know how to do to avoid my page being deleted by another hard ass again? Thanks, Tony /OpenVReg