Talk:TERA (video game)

Video games Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Darkworks (0 participants)
Ayeah Games (0 participants)
Keemokazi (1 participant)
Canderous Ordo (3 participants)
Dracthyr (7 participants)
Messhof (4 participants)
Lloyd Floyd (4 participants)
Batboat (11 participants)
List of video games with gyro features (6 participants; relisted)
Amiga Active (2 participants; relisted)
Goodboy Galaxy (9 participants; relisted)
Double Eleven (company) (4 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

First "action" MMORPG?

Is it really the first "Äction" MMORPG? You have to dodge and target/hit in Dungeons and Dragons Online... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.29.97 (talk) 00:31, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DDO is more of a hybrid, since it still uses a roll system to determine hits and misses as long as you point your weapon in the vague direction of the enemy. To my understanding, the way TERA works is that if it looked like your weapon hit, then it did. 24.109.63.235 (talk) 03:19, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Darkfall and Mortal Online predate this game and they are both twitched based MMO's.64.13.123.56 (talk) 03:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy dispute

The accuracy of the Features section of the article is disputed. The single cited source does not provide any of the information included. Find another source, or the section may be deleted as unreliable. 12.233.146.130 (talk) 23:29, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you disputing the accuracy because the link goes to a general class page that then links to each individual class, rather than having links to each class page? Because that's easily fixed, why didn't you just do it yourself rather than complaining about it? Never mind, I'll do it. 24.109.63.235 (talk) 03:19, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gender locked races

If you're going to mention that the Baraka have no gender options, you must mention that it's the same with the Popori and Elin as well (it's been officially announced that they're two separate races; the all-female Elin race came first, who then anthropomorphisized forest animals into the Popori). To infer that only Baraka have no "male and female counterparts" is misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.102.110.129 (talk) 05:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

release dates

Why aren't the release dates for Korea and Japan listed? Not that I know what they are. - 71.202.168.220 (talk) 01:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NCsoft et al v Bluehole Studio inc et al

Could the filed suit be relevant to the article ? If nothing else for the injunction from launching TERA in the US that NCSoft asks the court for. Here is the whole complaint as filed in the southern district of NY:

http://tsi.brooklaw.edu/sites/tsi.brooklaw.edu/files/filings/ncsoft-corporation-et-al-v-bluehole-studio-inc-et-al/20120109ncsoft-corporation-et-al-v-bluehole-studio-inc-et-alcomplaint.pdf 130.228.251.5 (talk) 08:38, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops nevermind it is already there. Missed it between "Plot" and "Races", maybe the section should be moved from between two gameplay sections. 130.228.251.5 (talk) 08:42, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per your suggestion, I moved the "Controversy" section to the end of the article. --Dragnilar (talk) 23:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really need a content section for each class?

Its at most a sentence or two of information under each class, don't see why there's clickable sections for each separate class when there's only a tiny bit of information for it. 24.233.254.51 (talk) 02:28, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree especially when the reception section is not even done yet Dusty Hayes (talk) 10:57, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree as well, this page needs to be completely reworked on in my opinion, 50%+ of it is just quotes and information that are truly irrelevant such as details on each class and race. --Kizikky (talk) 10:00, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]