User talk:Msrag

style="width:70%; Template:Border-radius padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 1em; font-size:150%; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:center"| Hello! Welcome to my Talk Page! User:Msrag Special:EmailUser/Msrag User:Msrag#My Plans... User:Msrag/Sandbox Special:Contributions/Msrag http://toolserver.org/~tparis/pcount/index.php?name=Msrag&wiki=wikipedia&lang=en Home Email Plans Sandbox Contributions Edit Count No rest, time for peer review!!! Congrats! Yes, you should take some rest. Meanwhile, put the article in peer review. This is essentially to get it reviewed by editors who are totally unattached with the article. There is no binding in PR, I mean no time-bound limit, like GA review, where you are expected to answer queries promptly. IMO it is right time for PR. Following PR, it can be moved towards FAC.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:10, 11 June 2012 (UTC) So, did you find a bunch of inconsistencies in reference formatting? I think |agency parameter may be an issue? Also, Ankit raised an issue about using IBNLive versus CNN-IBN. I do not know which one is what.--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:03, 12 June 2012 (UTC) It is indeed a very nice and succinct gist of plans for reference formatting. I don't have anything to add. Indeed this list should be placed in the talk page of most of the articles that are undergoing improvement. Only one thing that may be somewhat extra is "Breaking a single reference in multiple lines for better readability". I personally think that is a good idea, but do not know whether this will add to article size at the end.--Dwaipayan (talk) 13:19, 13 June 2012 (UTC) That's not too bad. 10 kb won't be a problem.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC) Hi! I see you have done a lot of "reference formatting" so that each look similar in the edit mode. Indeed this is not required as such, as long as the output of all the references are similar in the reading mode. Anyway, IMO it is time to put this up for peer review, as this might take a long time. Do you have any other wishes, structure and content-wise? Prose in some places is not up to the mark. But that will improve.--Dwaipayan (talk) 03:45, 23 June 2012 (UTC) A beer for you! Beer for your outstanding working on Kahaani,waiting for Paan Singh Tomar 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS (talk) 15:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC) INCINE notification Hello. This is to inform you that there is a discussion going on at WT:INCINE regarding a specific user. The discussion can be viewed here. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 12:03, 23 June 2012 (UTC) Panipuri for you! Pleasant1623 has invited you a for a plate of spicy Panipuri! Panipuri promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can give someone else a plate of Panipuri to spread Wikilove too! To share a plate of Panipuri, simply add {{subst:Panipuri}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message. Though I am a little late, I want to thank you for taking Kahaani to GA level. Fingers crossed for FA and I'll be there!--Plea$ant 1623 11:55, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Peer review That's great. While we think about other issues, the article will gain from peer review, if someone does the review. I think a heads up in wiki project films may be helpful. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 12:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC) A cup of coffee for you! Thank-you very much for your peer review of 'Gangs of Wasseypur'. I am looking forward to your work, and think i can contribute as well! So, we better get started ! Cheers ! Superb Work ! Bineet Ojha |BINEET| 15:32, 29 June 2012 (UTC) Help for Kahaani's FA If you need any help for taking Kahaani to FA, just ask me. I'll be available tommorow for the whole day. Cheers!--Plea$ant 1623 12:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC) Bol Bachchan I saw your message to me, based on the critical reception of Bol Bachchan. The style which I typed the review is the basic style of writing the section in movies. But I don't mean that your writing was wrong. So,I hope you won't change the section again. Thanks