Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Appearance
Rollback
- Ayanosh · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google) · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- Mostly use twinkle for reverting vandalism.Like most others, applying mainly for Huggle. Ayanosh (talk) 18:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
- Done--v/r - TP 23:32, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Vivek Rai · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google) · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I wish to enhance my Vandalism everting ability and my coontribution to Wikipedia. I am already using Twinkle for that, but wish to use STiki. VIVEK RAI : Friend? 07:32, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Not done I only see about 8 vandalism reverts. Get some more experience fighting vandalism and request the tools again.--v/r - TP 23:34, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I am Vivek's instructor at WP:CVUA. He is a recent recruit, and I have had one session with him, but he shows promise. I will be sure and exercise him in one of his chosen methods and get him more experience. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 23:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Not done I only see about 8 vandalism reverts. Get some more experience fighting vandalism and request the tools again.--v/r - TP 23:34, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Qantasplanes · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google) · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I welcome users and revert vandalism on Twinkle. Qantasplanes (talk) 07:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Could you please state how you have changed since your rollback rights were revoked in January (2012)? Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 08:27, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hi there, it was revoked after I unintentionally used it "wrongly" by a fellow editor after only one warning. I'd like to learn from that mistake and will (hopefully) never do it again. Qantasplanes (talk) 08:32, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Update: I have to disagree with some of your reverts. #1; Why did you undo this copyedit? #2 I have to disagree how you gave an IP adress a level 3 warning for adding unsourced content; I have no knowledge Deal or No Deal and understand why you reverted his edit but is a level 3 really necassary? I am also curious on why you decided to delete this conversation Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 08:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Explanation on the reverts, #1 Woops before it was "Japan Air Lines". #2 Yes, he's done it several times before. And why I deleted the conversation, by accident. Thank you Qantasplanes (talk) 09:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Rollbacks are trusted to be able to identify edits properly and deal with the issue properly. They are also trusted to assume good faith and check if they are not sure of then edit. For example 1, not only did you fail to identify it as a a good edit you also reverted it as vandalism. For example two, you are correct that he continued after you reverted his edit but that is because you did not inform him the first time (each revert should be followed up with a warning). I also suggest to discuss before you revert. Have a nice day! :-) Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 09:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you Qantasplanes (talk) 10:30, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Done Be careful with it. Second chances arn't given a second time.--v/r - TP 23:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you Qantasplanes (talk) 10:30, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Rollbacks are trusted to be able to identify edits properly and deal with the issue properly. They are also trusted to assume good faith and check if they are not sure of then edit. For example 1, not only did you fail to identify it as a a good edit you also reverted it as vandalism. For example two, you are correct that he continued after you reverted his edit but that is because you did not inform him the first time (each revert should be followed up with a warning). I also suggest to discuss before you revert. Have a nice day! :-) Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 09:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Explanation on the reverts, #1 Woops before it was "Japan Air Lines". #2 Yes, he's done it several times before. And why I deleted the conversation, by accident. Thank you Qantasplanes (talk) 09:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Update: I have to disagree with some of your reverts. #1; Why did you undo this copyedit? #2 I have to disagree how you gave an IP adress a level 3 warning for adding unsourced content; I have no knowledge Deal or No Deal and understand why you reverted his edit but is a level 3 really necassary? I am also curious on why you decided to delete this conversation Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 08:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hi there, it was revoked after I unintentionally used it "wrongly" by a fellow editor after only one warning. I'd like to learn from that mistake and will (hopefully) never do it again. Qantasplanes (talk) 08:32, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Could you please state how you have changed since your rollback rights were revoked in January (2012)? Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 08:27, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- AlexakaAlex · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google) · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I am requesting Rollback because, I have about 275 reverts and warns. 2 years of anti vandalism on the wikis,
on a different account name. I do use Twinkle, but I seek a manual way of doing vandalism or using Igloo. Thank You. AlexakaAlex (talk) 06:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Can you tell us the other account name?--Chip123456 06:53, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Please explain why this is a vandalism revert. Franamax (talk) 12:45, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- I think I made a mistake, it look like vandalism to me, I'll try to not do it again.--AlexakaAlex (talk) 17:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)Hmm, RedYoshii was blocked for sockpuppetry ... apparently a sock of Shakinglord ... However RedYoshii is now unblocked... RedYoshii last edited less than an hour ago. A good tip, don't edit under multiple accounts in the simultaneously in the future, but I don't think the last one mattered much because it is just to your userspace. Also, as far as tenure is concerned, Wikipedia's policies are different from other Wikis, so 2 years of reverting Wikias may not count much here. Mysterytrey talk 17:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Not done Just not enough experience on this wiki. Please come back when you have more experience. (300 more edits, another month, more vandalism fighting).--v/r - TP 23:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Paris1127 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google) · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I use Twinkle to welcome new users and revert vandalism, and am careful to assume good faith when reverting. Paris1127 (talk) 09:08, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- Done--v/r - TP 12:33, 25 July 2012 (UTC)