Talk:Lee Newton

There is a request, submitted by Soulboost (talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "article is about a notable news host and person in maxim's magazine.".

Biography: Arts and Entertainment Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Comedy Unassessed

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.

Comments

I personally see no reason for this article to be marked for deletion. 86.147.174.20 (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I second the decision to remove the mark for deletion. This person is a notable person for making it to Maxim's top 100. ~ter890~talk 16:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

Other than the Maxim hot 100 List she has not done anything that is Notable. Yes she is on a show that might have missions of views. That does not make her notable she is one of many youtuber. As many say Sourcefed had millions of views, where is your data to back it up? you have to to have third party data, your option is not enough. Also there was a supposed crash on Maxim because of the votes but again where is your proof? This wiki entry looks like a joke to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.145.133 (talk) 21:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where is my proof about the 100 million of views on sourcefed? [1][2][3] Proof of the crash: [4] Exact proof can't be shown since you weren't on the website at the time of the crash. And this wiki entry is supposed to be the joke? Soulboost (talk) 11:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although their is some evidence to provide hints that their was a crash for example, Maxim had to add a captcha security feature which changed the entire voting process.[5] Soulboost (talk) 08:34, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Tag

This article just was "kept" at AFD, yet one editor keeps placing a "notability" tag on the article (and removing content), even though he participated in the AfD and was apparently unable to convince fellow editors of his opinion. I have no personal opinion as to this article, however, I don't believe people who "lose" at AfD should try to delete by subterfuge immediately after an AfD closes.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 15:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AFD is to decide if an article is deleted, not whether it currently meets policy/guideline x. Resolve the issue of having an in detail 3rd party source, then you can remove it yourself.--Otterathome (talk) 15:50, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The vast majority of AfD discussions are brought to test the notability of the subject. Indeed, here the AfD nominator's sole rationale in total was "This subject lacks notability." There was no other valid basis for discussion at that point. The consensus outcome was that she was notable. You participated in the discussion. Remove the tag now or you may be perma-banned.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 15:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see no consensus that the subject meets notability guidelines.--Otterathome (talk) 16:09, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was kept because its notable. WP:NOTABILITY says the article must meet the general notability guidelines or a subject specific guideline. WP:ENTERTAINER is clearly met. I see no reason for that tag, so I'm removing it. Dream Focus 18:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do explain.--Otterathome (talk) 17:25, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was explained to you by someone already in the AFD. Maxim proves she Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. and thus passing WP:ENTERTAINER. Dream Focus 18:11, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Completely fails the basic criteria, but skims by as 'Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following' due to being mentioned after being spammed on a website. None of the sources go beyond a passing mention. Seems like a good example of WP:1E/WP:BLP1E to me. Will go AFD again in due course, assuming the 3rd party sources remain the same.--Otterathome (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The YouTube channel has 430,943 subscribers and 114,536,964 video views. [6] So I'm thinking she had a cult following before this. Dream Focus 19:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably had to do with it being a Phillip Defranco Inc. channel, which has millions of subscribers who will do what he wants