Talk:Robert Stigwood

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

Australia: Music Start‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Robert Stigwood is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

England Start‑class Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Robert Stigwood be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

We really have far too much of this article. --194.82.45.23 03:29, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. This is a good, in-depth description of this man's career. Eligius (talk) 01:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this is far too much detail into Stigwood's business deals and not enough about his success such as with the Bee Gees who credit him with turning their careers around. This fact isn't even mentioned in this article only that they were at rock bottom in 1970. Stigwood turned the Bee Gees into superstars inviting them to provide songs for his Saturday Night Live film. This article seems a little biased and negative. Clean it up please. ~~

Negative - it's incredibly negative! I removed a () about "no doubt at NEMS expense" and was about to remove this bit of text "Five years later Travolta again displayed his now-legendary inability to pick roles"... now-legendary ability? Has this article been vandalised or something? There are lots of places where the text has this kind of petty, nit-picking with no sources and I can't see how to take them out without breaking something. A really bad article!