Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kudpung (talk | contribs) at 03:45, 29 January 2013 (→‎User:Ludde23: d). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Autopatrolled

(add requestview requests)

User:Mishae

Made many biology articles. FrankDev (talk) 00:40, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I want to know how the regulars at WikiProject Insects feel about those articles. The ones I checked are based solely on a single database entry. I've asked about the articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Insects. --Orlady (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done; Stale request. One-line, one-source stubs generally do not demonstrate a sufficiently broad knowledge of content creation policies and guidelines. Such stubs are easy for our NPPers to patrol. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:42, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Widr

Lately I've started to translate and modify notable Finnish music and movies related articles from Finnish Wikipedia to English, even creating some new ones. Granted, most are stubs or stubbish at this point, but I'm planning to expand them and turn more red links into proper articles. Widr (talk) 00:10, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Widr (talk) 00:10, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Excellent contributions but autopatrolled articles should be free of anything that patrollers would tag and require other editors to clean up. Please review your creations and above all please format the references correctly (naked URLs, etc). Then reapply. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:04, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jaguar

Had my Autopatrolled removed in May. I am willing to get it back again as I want to create more articles. Jaguar 19:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Mainly all stubs about Chinese localities. Essential of course, but short stubs generally do not demonstrate a sufficiently broad knowledge of content creation policies and guidelines. 'Autopatrolled' is not a right that has any benefit for the user and won't help you to create more articles. Such stubs are easy for our NPPers to patrol. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:39, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:AutomaticStrikeout

I'm not requesting this because of the articles I've created. Rather, I've created plenty of other perfectly valid pages not in mainspace. Rather than the pages remaining unpatrolled for who knows how long, it might be better for them to be automatically patrolled. It's not that big of a deal, but I figured it was worth asking. AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 01:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - Yes, it's not a big deal, because Autopatrolled is not a 'User right' per se. Please reapply when you have made the recommended minimum of 50 articles. If you are worried about pages generally remaining unpatrolled for too long, if you have sufficient experience, please consider lending a hand at Special:NewPagesFeed - after having read WP:NPP, and if you need any help with it, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:12, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:GrooveDog

I'm active again at Articles for Creation and it would be nice to reduce some of the load on the NPP team. Had it remove once or twice already per self-request. GrooveDog FOREVER 17:07, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Tyrol5 [Talk] 00:23, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ludde23

This user is creating a large number of articles for the Lists of state leaders by year category. Patrolling each one individually at NPP feels a bit redundant as they're all of the same quality and the user seems to be familiar enough with policies and guidelines. — daranzt ] 06:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:45, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]