Talk:Seal of the Prophets

Ibn al-Arabi's quotations un verifiable

I have added tag because the reference is not verifiable. Please provide complete edition you are referring to along with the name of publisher.

--Abrar Ahmed (talk) 16:54, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

More Deoband facts

Kaukab Noorani writes,

From http://www.islamicacademy.org/html/Articles/English/Black%20and%20White.htm

The present head of the Deobandi-Wahaabi-Tableeghi Jama'at, Janab Abul Hasan Ali Nadvi, on page 55 of his book, Sawaanih Maulana Abdul Qaadir Raipuri, says: "In those days Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani's claim and invitations were much talked about, specially in the Punjab, where few Musalmaan localities were free of such talks and discussions would continue. Near the home-town (Dhudiyan) of Hazrat (Abdul Qaadir Raipuri) is a place called 'Bhera'. An aalim there, who was also a student of the family elders of the Hazrat (Raipuri), Hakeem Noorud-deen (Qadiani), was a close devotee and assistant of Mirza Sahib (Qadiani) and had permanently settled in Qadian to be of help to him (Mirza Qadiani) in achieving success for him and for the sake of his companionship. There was much talk in his circle of devotees and in his sphere of influence of the claim of Mirza Sahib to be a person favoured by Allah and for his being blessed with acceptance of his supplication. The Hazrat (Raipuri) had read it somewhere in Mirza Sahib's (Qadiani's) writings that Allah had inspired in him the saying, Ajeebu kulla duaa'ika illaf shurakaa'ika (I will grant all your supplications except those made for your partners), So The Hazrat (Raipuri) in a letter to Mirza Sahib (Qadiani) from 'Afzal Grah' referred to this very inspiration and promise and requested him that since he had no partnership with him (Qadiani) he should make supplication so that he may be given guidance and his breast be opened up. A letter from there written by one Maulvi Abdul Kareem Sahib informed him (Raipuri) that his letter had been received and much supplication had been made for him. So, he should keep reminding about it occasionally. The Hazrat (Raipuri) used to say that in those days a post card cost one Pisa and so he would occasionally post a card to Mirza Qadiani by way of a reminder for supplicating on his behalf."

More about the special disciple of Janab Shah Abdur Raheem Raipuri, Janab Abdul Qaadir Raipuri (whose real name was Ghulam Jeelaani). On page 62 of his book, Abul Hasan Nadvi Sahib writes: "Giving an account of the meetings held by Hakeem Sahib (Noorud-deen Qadiani), he (Abdul Qaadir Raipuri) said 'I used to watch him (Hakeem Sahib) recite every now and then the Qur'aanic verse La ilaaha illa anta Subhaanaka inni kuntu minaz zaalimeen with such compassion that one felt drawn towards it. Then, I would think how a person possessing such ecstasy and nearness to Allah can be so ignoramous? But at the same time I would think in my heart that if Allah is most compassionate and most merciful, and He is undoubtedly so, He cannot leave him in such ignominy". During this journey, he also met Mirza Sahib (Qadiani), and he (Abdul Qaadir Raipuri) used to say that he would sometimes say his prayers behind him (Mirza Qadian) and sometimes separately." Khokhar976

User:Khokhar976

This editor is a Qadiani and always try to create a rift among Muslims by misquoting Muslim scholars of other schools. e.g. He has tried to prove in this article that Sufi do not believe in finality of prophethood by misquoting Ibn-Arabi. The same about Deobandies by misquoting Maulana Nanatvi.

Everyone interested in facts should know that the Movement for Protection of Finality of Prophethood (Majlis Tahaffuz Khatm Nabuwwat) is not a Salafi movement but includes all schools of Mainstream Muslims such as Deobandies, Barelvies, Shias, Ahl-Hadith etc. In fact the Majlis was headed by a Deobandi Maulana Yusuf Bannori, the resolution was presented in Pakistani Parliament by a Sufi leader Maulana Shah Ahmed Noorani, and the argument in Supreme court were given by a Shai scholar Allama Naseer Al-Ijtihadi.

Not one school of Mainstream Muslims doubt the meaning of Khatme Nabuwwat is other than end of line of Prophethood. I have removed all such false misrepresentation by Qadiani editor Khokhar976. Hassanfarooqi 13:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Please contribute to the topic with references related to the topic itself. Any editor with any religious affiliation is welcome to add information in Wikipedia. The Majlis TKM is notorious for its anti-shia stance and it is wrong to say that shia take part in this organization. The main contributors to the organization are Sunnis and Wahabis. There is a seperate topic dealing with that orgnaization. The theme here is only the belief of finality of prophethood. 172.213.94.122

172.213.94.122, you are simply a vandal as I observed in your many posts. You are nothing more than a dedicated vandal to do anything to hide the bare back of the Ahmadiya. When all the sects of Mulims have passed the resolution to define the meaning of 'khatme Nabuwwat' as the 'finality of prophethood' then who are you single negligible vandal? Are you more significant then that all parliment? VirtualEye 05:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

172.213.94.122 (or shall I call you Khokhar976), give me one proof that MTKN is anti-shia. Please do not quote from books published by Qadiani press (explicit or implicit). If one is to believe in these books, then Ubaidullah Sindhi, a staunch Wahhabi anti-British Muslim, was a pro-British Qadiani.

In any case, it was not MTKN that made Qadianese non-Muslim. It was the Supreme court of Pakistan that declared it only after the Qadiani Chief testified that their religion is seperate from Mainstream Islam. The resolution was tabled in Parliament by a Sufi political leader Maulana Shah Ahmed Noorani (and you prove that Sufies do not believe in finality of prophethood), and it was approved by Barelvis, Deobandies, Shias, and even Christian members of Parliament. Hassanfarooqi 14:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

All you have to do is to prove your stupid notions. Bring references and proper citations and I will gladly accept your edits. 172.188.123.219

Hate Material

This is a scholarly topic requiring historical and theological material. Do not include hate material just because you do not agree with one of the editors. SaifullahKhalid

Same Goes to you . Khalidkhoso 22:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

You can request mediation if you are so adamant on spreading your POVs SaifullahKhalid

Please do not vandalize the article by adding irrelevent info. Khokhar976

Quotes

Please see WP:Quotes for the usage of quotes. If you would like to add material to articles, it's up to you to do the work. You can't just dump a bunch of stuff into the article and expect someone else to do the work.

If you would like to add a quote, I suggest that you evaluate if the article has enough quotes already, if not, you want to evaluate your quotes and select the one or two that best illustrate the point you are trying to make. Then you can add them to the article, properly cited, and properly integrated into the article.--Editor2020 (talk) 17:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

How to use quotations, from WP:QUOTE

"Second, editors should try to work quotations into the body of the article, rather than in a stand-alone quote section. Wikipedia is not a list or repository of loosely associated topics such as quotations. A simple list of quotations would be better suited for our sister project, Wikiquote.

Similarly, quotations should always be presented with an introduction; as a stand-alone quotation is not a proper paragraph. Quotations should be put in context and given any necessary explanation. As an editor, it is your responsibility to read the source of the quotation thoroughly, in order to prevent misrepresentation.

Third, while quotations are an indispensable part of Wikipedia, try not to overuse them. Too many quotes take away from the encyclopedic feel of Wikipedia. Also, editors should avoid long quotations if they can keep them short. Long quotations not only add to the length of many articles that are already too long, but they also crowd the actual article and remove attention from other information.

Fourth, there is normally no need to put quotations in italics unless the material would otherwise call for italics (emphasis, use of non-English words, etc.). Indicate whether using the italics in the original text or whether they were added later. For example:

Now cracks a noble heart. Good night sweet prince: And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest! (emphasis added)

For information regarding the use of punctuation with quotations, including the use of quotation marks around quotes, please see the Manual of Style.

Quotations should generally be worked into the article text, so as not to inhibit the pace, flow and organization of the article. Longer quotes may need to be set apart, generally through the use of wikitext templates such as {{Quote}}, {{Quotation}}, or {{Cquote}}, or HTML block quotes. As a matter of style, quoteboxes should generally be avoided as they draw special attention to the opinion of one source, and present that opinion as though Wikipedia endorses it; quoteboxes may be acceptable in certain circumstances, especially when the quote is itself notable, and a major part of the article's topic. If you think an article needs a quote set apart from the text through a quotebox or other method, please get a consensus on the article talk page first."

Not mainstream Islam

I propose to remove the banner, and merge with Ahmiddyya section 90.192.59.155 (talk) 12:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

This topic is also a concept within mainstream Islam too.Peaceworld111 (talk) 09:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

I propose to merge both the articles as they are both one and close, I am talking about "Khatim an Nabuwat" and "Seal of Prophets" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatom2k (talk • contribs) 20:19, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

I agree, but which heading will be chosen?Peaceworld111 (talk) 20:53, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

I think it should be merged in a way that either one of name directs to same material as material in both are almost common except a little. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatom2k (talk • contribs) 20:57, 24 July 2010 (UTC) i.e. two topics but same material as is the case with many other articles in wiki..

I think the title should be "Seal of the Prophets" as this is an English encyclopedia but the other terms should still redirect here.

I agree--88.111.123.155 (talk) 17:50, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Ibn al-Arabi's references

Available on http://archive.org/search.php?query=Futuhat%20Makkiyah%20AND%20collection%3Atoronto (Arabic) http://archive.org/details/Futuhat-ul-makkiyyah-UrduTranslation (Urdu) Tahira Shah (talk) 11:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Are they authentic?--79.69.96.179 (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2013 (UTC)