Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Rollback
- BigPimpinBrah · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- Been fighting vandalism a couple months, I request rollback to help fight vandalism BigPimpinBrah (talk) 21:05, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Smileguy91 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- To better fight vandalism in new pages and in the recent changes log smileguy91talk 03:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Not done Sorry, but I just don't see any anti-vandalism efforts. Speedys and AfDs won't be helped by Rollback. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- DragonLord · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I've been using Twinkle to revert vandalism during RC patrols for quite a while, and rollback can be more efficient than Twinkle. —DragonLord(talk/contribs) 01:52, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Done. I'd argue that Twinkle's actually rather more efficient that rollback, but aside from a few cases where you may have been a little over-keen to apply the "vandal" label I see no cause for concern in your edit history - so you may as well have the (IMHO) less efficient rollback function as well. Yunshui 雲水 08:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)