Talk:Suicide in Japan
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Japan Start‑class Top‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Death: Suicide Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
Type of gas poisoning
Somebody removed the type of gas from the article and I restored it. I think it deserves a comment here. First, Wikipedia is an information source and a general principle upheld time and time again is that we don't remove information ("censor") because some people are offended, or the information could be misused, etc. Second, anybody that wants to learn what type of gas could simply click on the reference to find out, so Wikipedia is hardly endangering anyone who already obviously has access to the Internet. And to forestall argument, let me add that being vague and asking people to search or click on external links is not a viable alternative; an article is supposed to sum up the available information and that's why, like the newspapers, it should say "hydrogen sulfide gas" not just make reference to some mystery gas. Third, I purposefully omitted information on how the gas is typically produced and used to suicide. Not only is Wikipedia not a how-to manual (by firmly established precedent), but I do agree editors need to act responsibly here while not going to excessive lengths to censor information. Like I said, people that want further details for whatever reason, I'm sure they know how to go about it and in fact, "hydrogen sulfide" is not needed as a search term. So while I understand the sentiment of the anon who removed the info, I think it is misplaced and doesn't make a whole lot of sense. --C S (talk) 23:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Expired link
The link ^ "Girl's suicide leaves dozens ill from fumes" (in English), /asia, CNN.com (24 April 2008). Retrieved on 20 September 2008. cannot be found. --yeokaiwei (talk) 20.00, 03 January 2008 (UTC)
The link ^ "Suicides in Japan top 30,000 for 12th straight year, may surpass 2008 numbers". The Mainichi Daily News. Dec. 26, 2009. http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20091226p2a00m0na008000c.html. (this link cannot be found) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antiw (talk • contribs) 08:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
further topics for expansion
I'm making a note here so I don't forget, and perhaps others are interested in researching the topics.
- Muri-shinju (murder-suicide, usually mother (sometimes father), will kill their children and then herself), also called "ikka-shinju" in media. Sources: [1],
- Apparently police sometimes will count a muri-shinju (or otherwise suspicious death) as a suicide to lower the homicide rate. Need sources and further investigation.
--C S (talk) 01:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Where to link, where to link
The article Japan Airlines Flight 123 notes that a maintenance manager for the airline killed himself to apologize for the accident (which was caused by a faulty repair seven years earlier). I wanted to provide a link to help explain to readers why he did this - this article itself is the best I could come up with. Is there something better to link to? D O N D E groovily Talk to me 16:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Footnote [28] refers to an advertisement. Removed.
I removed the external link in footnote [28] because it is outdated. It does not refer to the article anymore. It only refers to an advertisement for a subscription. --Qualitaetssicherer 00:12, 21 August 2012 (CET)
- Restored. We do not delete references for purely technical reasons, and purely technical reason includes dead links and subscription fee required. A person who has a subscription can read the article just fine, and even if not, someone could always call the paper and request a copy of the article. Ego White Tray (talk) 12:28, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of date
Suicides in Japan have fallen to a 15-year low: [2] If someone has time to help update the article, please do. Pdxuser (talk) 12:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Don't know about long cultural tradition
The Japanese Army inculcated an aversion to surrender before World War Two because many of its units and men had surrendered at the first sign of contact with enemy troops in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-5, thus I'm not sure you can describe fighting under suicidal conditions as culturally essentialistic to Japan; also kamikazes were accompanies by armed fighters (kamikaze planes had no guns or ammo just a bomb and enough fuel to get to the battle) with orders to shoot them down if they changed their minds. Historian932 (talk) 20:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Misleading and Bad Phrasing
"There has been a rapid increase in suicides since the 1990s. For example, 1998 saw a 34.7% increase over the previous year." Anyone reading this will assume that this "example" is exemplary for an explosive growth of suicide numbers. The statistic shown on this very same article says that 1998 saw an extraordinary increase of suicides, with the numbers being relatively stable before and after. Just to demonstrate how vast the difference between these two things is: Assuming that Japan saw an increase of suicides of 30% for every year between 1998 and 2007 (10 years), the number would have grown to ~14 times its original size. --93.206.55.231 (talk) 22:38, 31 May 2013 (UTC)