Talk:Kamakhya Temple
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Lower Assam C‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Hinduism: Shaktism B‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | India: Assam B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
![]() | Religion Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Ahom builders
The report by Banerji is available on the web. Please read it before contesting the claims, as done here.
Banerji mentions constructions and structures between the 8th and the 17th century. The Koch kingdom broke up by the end of the 16th century, and Kamakhya was under the control of the Ahoms/Mughals in the 17th century. The report mentions 3 successive constructions. The first is attributed to the 8th century. The second is to the Koch, and the third to the Ahoms. He writes, "the lower part of the sanctum is in good preservation and was used by the Ahom builders".
Chaipau (talk) 11:46, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
/* The current structure has been built during the Ahom times,[4] in "Kamakhya Temple" */
Dear Chaipu, In the book "The Mother Goddess Kamakhya" by the noted scholar Dr. Banikanta Kakati, in page 37 it is clearly mentioned that the present temple was re-built in 1565 A.D. by king Naranarayan of koch kingdom after the destruction of the original Temple under Moslem invasion. You can also refer to this in the following link
http://www.assamtribune.com/sep2709/sunday.html
Since Naranarayan(1540-1587) was not under the Ahoms, it makes no sense if you write "The current structure has been built during the Ahom times". As you pointed out, Benarjee might be wrong in giving historical data such as during whose reign the temple was built(I already pointed out such mistakes) or may be we are misinterpreting his writings(like I suggested one alternative explanation). Books can be wrong like you removed * Sukhabilāsa Barmā (2004). Bhāwāiyā: Ethnomusicological Study. Global Vision Publishing Ho. pp. 74–. ISBN 978-81-8220-070-8. Retrieved 30 May 2013. considering it a terrible book.
One more thing, can you please give me an account as to why and how the Ahom king had to come into construction of the temple? (eg. Naranarayan re-built it because it was destroyed, like that what reasons made Ahom king to do the construction as you told.)
Last but not the least, the very inscription inside the temple itself mentions that the temple was built by Chilarai during Naranayan's reign; so, does it really need a debate?!?
Hope, you will consider the matter with due care and take necessary steps.
- C-Class Lower Assam articles
- High-importance Lower Assam articles
- B-Class Hinduism articles
- High-importance Hinduism articles
- High-importance Shaktism articles
- B-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Assam articles
- Low-importance Assam articles
- B-Class Assam articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Assam articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Unassessed Religion articles
- Unknown-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles