Jump to content

Talk:Poon Lim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.235.195.164 (talk) at 16:14, 8 June 2013 (→‎Untitled). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



Untitled

There appears to be a contradiction here as I find this sentence early on in the article: "All of the rest of the crew of 46 died in this incident."

...followed by this one later: "He later found out that only 11 others of the ship's crew of 55 had been rescued."

Which one of these is correct? (128.226.70.28 (talk) 13:04, 8 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

good question - there is an external link to trivia library on this page - there it claims also that there were 55 members, but also claims that only 5 escaped. What's the real story? http://www.trivia-library.com/b/history-of-chinese-life-raft-survivor-poon-lim-part-1.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superwesman (talkcontribs) 19:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An account in _The People's Almanac 2_, which I would not consider an entirely reliable source but appears to have been quoted (without attribution) in this article anyway (the shark-catching paragraph is almost word-for-word) indicates that a lifeboat with five sailors aboard also escaped the sinking, and that they were the only other survivors. I don't know what their sources were.

Fair use rationale for Image:Poon-Lim.jpg

Image:Poon-Lim.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Poon-Lim.jpg

Image:Poon-Lim.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]