Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Surfer43 (talk | contribs) at 10:39, 23 June 2013 (advice). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Shortcuts

Rollback

(add request • view requests)


User:Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi

I am a good regular editor. I have hundreds of edits and much experience in reverting vandalism. I will use these rights for reverting vandals. I’d love to use Huggle and Stiki... —Шαмıq ☪ тαʟκ✍ @ 16:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. You have 682 edits to 292 unique pages with a total of 83 'undos' and '23 'reverts' since joining Wikipedia on 14 March. Please do a couple of hundred reverts clearly marked as pure vandalism, and then apply for the tool again. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:53, 21 June 2013 (UTC).[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) If you request permission for STiki on its talk page, you should be able to get access. I got access to STiki with much less edits than you with background in New Pages Patrol. Then I came here with STiki background, and got rollback permission, so now I can use Huggle. Surfer (talk) 10:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ken Seh

Deal with vandalism more. Ken Seh 19:48, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) You have done quite a good job fighting vandalism, but I have to point out that many of your edits are to your user page. Maybe more vandalism work? smileguy91talk 02:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. You have only 126 edits to mainspace since joining Wikipedia on 18 April. Please do a couple of hundred reverts clearly marked as pure vandalism, and then apply for the tool again. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:01, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Argento1985

I'm fighting vandalism and my edits/contributions i believe that help wikipedia on a point to stay as a good accurate source for people to look for. I'm requesting roll back access to be more effective (Argento1985) 17:38, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Out of a total of 520 mainspace edits only around 60 or so of these are reverts and while correct, they are not all pure vandalism. As Rollback is a tool to be use strictly only for vandalism, please make a significant number of pure vandalism reverts and then apply again. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Epicgenius

I would like to further assist in the expunging of vandalism on Wikipedia. Even though many of my edits are not vandalism reverts, I already use Twinkle, and I am sometimes a new-page and recent changes patroller. Additionally, I already have the reviewer right and want to clean up more vandalism on Wikipedia. Epicgenius(talk to me • see my contributions) 13:49, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. It comes close on the heels of your request for reviewer, but checking your history, as long as you bear in mind that rollbacker is for use in clear cases of vandalism, I think you'll put it to good work. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:00, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:SamX

So far, I've made about 1,400 edits to Wikipedia, many of them vandalism reverts. My present MO is to patrol Special:AbuseLog, then use twinkle to revert any edit that I deem vandalism. However, I'd like to start using Huggle, and possibly STiki in the future, as they're more effective than Twinkle, based on what I've read. I have read WP:RBK, and understand that rollback and associated tools must only be used to revert clear-cut cases of vandalism. SamX‧☎‧✎ 15:21, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Forgot to say–I've previously edited under the username of Mathnerd 101, but got a username change yesterday. Just thought that would be good to know. --SamX‧☎‧✎ 15:22, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done INeverCry 19:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:DDreth

I use twinkle to check the Special:Recent Changes for possible vandalism, some times it shows section blanking and could potentially mean vandalism unless the user or IP had a reason to do it, sometimes vandalism is hard to find in the recent changes because most has removal of content and or section blanking DDreth 11:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) You've already done some good work with fighting vandalism, but you still have less than 500 edits on your account, which could make your RFR a bit edgy. smileguy91talk 14:16, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You've done about 50 reverts so far. Keep up the good work. Please do another 150 vandalism reverts, and then request this right again. INeverCry 18:56, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Soffredo

I am a regular editor and I have removed vandalism before. Soffredo (talk) 18:35, 22 June 2013 (UTC) If this request is denied, please place this userbox onto my page in the appropriate spot:[reply]
This user requested to be a rollback user, however they were denied.


 Not done I only see a few pure vandalism reverts in your edit history. Please return and ask for this right again after doing 200 or more vandalism reverts. As for the userbox, you can place that on your userpage yourself if you want. INeverCry 18:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What is my current vandalism reverts count? 19:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
I only saw 3 reverts in your history that look like pure vandalism. INeverCry 19:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Soffredo (talk) 20:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Avenue X at Cicero

Not technically a request for rollbacking rights, but a request to enable Huggle on my account since I've been locked out of using it. Kindly oblige. Thank you. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 22:40, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
: Not done You've just today come back from a break of over a year, probably best to take it slow at first, establish a track record of reverting vandalism through other means, and the re-apply later. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:55, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently I misunderstood, thinking you just wanted rollback so that you could use Huggle. As I suppose you knew you already have rollback. That si pretty much all we do at this board. It's not clear from your remarks how and why you were "locked out" of Huggle but you will need to revisits whatever forum that happened at to get access back. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:59, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I do have rollback rights, but I do not have access to Huggle. I tried manually enabling it through this page, but failed to do so since it's fully protected. Is there any way I could be given access to Huggle? Regards. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 06:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:SubSeven

Been squashing vandals for several years! This would help in my efforts. SubSeven (talk) 00:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done INeverCry 01:31, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&oldid=561185454"