Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kudpung (talk | contribs) at 01:36, 30 June 2013 (→User:BaldBoris: d). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Shortcuts

Rollback

(add request • view requests)


User:Peroxwhy2gen

I would like to revert vandalism and test/non-constructive edits easier. Peroxwhy2gen Talk 15:50, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Taking a broad overview of your contribs, I see only 29 user talk edits, 14 of which were to your own talk page. This would seem to indicate that you are not warning vandals or notifying users that you have reverted their edits, which is part of responsible reverting. I would suggest you work on that and re-apply later. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vihelik

A series of good-faith edits by an anonymous user on June 26 regarding the demographics of Northern Europe have erroneously matched the statistics of the UK with the label of England. Reverting these changes requires multiple steps. Since it is not the first time I encounter such problems and in all likelihood it will happen again, I would like to be able to rollback destructive/erroneous changes in the future. Vihelik (talk) 20:06, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Rollback is strictly only for clear cases of vandalism. You hve only made a dozen or so reverts in the past 12 months and only three or fojur were vandalism. You will be able to manually revert any cases of vandalism you come across, or use twinkle. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:15, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sicaspi

To revert vandalism. ,dgjdksvc;jknhg (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. You have only made around 300 mainspace edits and only 8 of these were reverts. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:47, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ahecht

I've been using Twinkle for reverting vandalism, but I would like rollback permission to be able to use Huggle. Thanks. Ahecht (talk) 16:19, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Signalizing

I've been registered with the project since 2010, and although I took an editing break for the majority of 2012, since then, I've really gotten a grasp on the policies and nuances of RC Patrolling. I'll be the first person to admit I've made a few mistakes while RC patrolling, but I've owned up to any mistakes I made so far by either giving benefit of the doubt that there was no malicious intent if a user reached out to me, or apologizing if I acted in error and rectifying the situation by reverting myself. I'm requesting rollback to be able to edit with Huggle. Signalizing (talk) 21:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Feedthepope

Ease of reverting vandalism. I had rollback rights on a previous account (had my account shut down ~two years ago via WP:VANISH because my personal username was showing up in search engine results; I was not interested in WP:CLEANSTART and renaming at the time) amassing 11,000 edits. Once you've used Huggle before, non-rollback processes like Twinkle and watching recent changes just don't cut it! You can see from my vandal fighting on this account, as well as new page patrolling and template creating, my "contribution" as it were. Feedthepope (talk) 03:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done This account is new. It only has 51 mainspace edits. What you did before you vanished/clean started cannot be taken in to consideration. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Uncletomwood

I am an adoptee of user:Go Phightins! and i am a frequent user of Twinkle.Most of my edits are for reverting vandalism like edits and removing SPAM links by anonymous IP's,it is my humble opinion that i am granted rollback privileges as it will help me better in fighting vandalism Uncletomwood (talk) 11:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Yes, Tom is my adoptee. Unfortunately for this request, the only lesson at which he has not yet succeeded is the one on vandalism, so I would probably oppose this request for rollback until he gets a better understanding of what is, but more importantly what is not vandalism. Thanks, Go Phightins! 11:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done (yet). You beat me to it Go Phightins! I was about to suggest some feedback from you before considering this application. By all means let me or another admin know when you feel your adoptee is ready. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If my adopter says so :P Uncletomwood (talk) 11:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:AlneltheGreat

Reason for requesting rollback Alnel Vincent Alico 11:26, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Please I want to help improving Wikipedia.Alnel Vincent Alico 11:26, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. You only have 26 edits to mainspace. Please do a couple of hundred pure vandalism reverts and then apply again. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:BaldBoris

Will help me combat the war against vandalism. BaldBoris 00:25, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&oldid=562187163"