Jump to content

User talk:AnemoneProjectors

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tinamckintyre23 (talk | contribs) at 09:12, 24 July 2013 (→‎I noticed...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Archive box collapsible

Help

Hey, could you please remove the protection from Holly Hoyland? I think it's been salted. The character is returning to Neighbours in a few weeks and I need to create a redirect. - JuneGloom Talk 15:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Yes it was salted. –anemoneprojectors15:13, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I probably should have requested it ages ago, but it just wasn't important then. I always thought the powers that be would bring her back eventually though. - JuneGloom Talk 15:56, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, could you please protect List of Home and Away characters (2010) again? A day after coming off protection and the sock returned to disrupt the article. - JuneGloom Talk 00:17, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done :-) –anemoneprojectors07:57, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! - JuneGloom Talk 18:45, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm currently working on an article for an episode of Neighbours, but I'm not sure which title I should go with. Should it be "Episode 6646" or "The Eclipse"? The latter is what the episode was called in all the publicity and on the Channel 5 site, but I don't think it was the official name (since the show doesn't use them, just numbers). - JuneGloom Talk 16:58, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps go with the one used in publicity, since it's probably the WP:COMMONNAME for it. You might need to clarify somewhere that it's not an official title, but you'd have to find that out... Sometimes I wish the soaps did name their episodes! EastEnders just dates them. –anemoneprojectors17:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll go with "The Eclipse" then. It sounds a lot better too. Neighbours did name their episodes from 2004 to mid 2007. I reckon they would have run out of names by now though. - JuneGloom Talk 17:45, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Doctors seems to name their episodes and they've had 2500+. I don't think soaps can really go for names because each episode is a continuation of the last anyway. Better to name the storylines, I reckon. –anemoneprojectors17:50, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please move User:JuneGloom07/Sheila to Sheila Canning for me? - JuneGloom Talk 15:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. –anemoneprojectors15:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! - JuneGloom Talk 15:35, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - July 2013

Issue XXXII Project Eurovision
monthly
Click image below to read full edition
Click here to read the latest newsletter

At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows
Total Number of Members Active Members Inactive Members Total Number of Articles Number of Good Articles Number of Featured Articles Require Improvements
71 48 23 4843 16 2 1413

To discontinue receiving Eurovision newsletters and mini memorandums, please remove your name from here.

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 19:03, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't anybody answering me?

I was just wondering, why do you think nobody is answering me on my Duration change! Section on the Peggy Mitchell talk page? Thanks. Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 17:02, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't speak for anyone else, but I go through my watchlist from oldest to newest and am currently still on yesterday's edits, because I haven't been on Wikipedia today. Maybe also you're too impatient and haven't left enough time, because not everyone edits every day. Also, there aren't as many interested people as there used to be - the EastEnders project regulars are vanishing. I've replied now because you posted here, otherwise I would have replied when I got to it. –anemoneprojectors19:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tina, I don't edit every day at the minute because I'm very busy at work. When I do log on I check ClueBot is working ok first and I check the bots messages first before I even do any admin work, look at my watchlist, check my own messages etc etc etc. I'm one of the EE project regulars and I only got to your post a few minutes ago but my fellow admin beat me to it :)--5 albert square (talk) 22:11, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I take offence by that comment

Excuse me, I want to let you know that I took offence by your comment on my talk page saying: "Sometimes I wonder if you're just here to cause trouble". I am only 9 years old and I will be reporting this comment. Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 19:31, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I don't think someone your age should be editing Wikipedia. I kind of assumed (from your user name) that you're 23. –anemoneprojectors08:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not nine years old, I'm 28, I was just joking. Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 14:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's not funny. I do assume good faith but I don't understand how you can think Pauline Fowler is better known to anybody as Pauline Macer, when she never even took the name. Your page move (and changing Abi from Branning to Cross) didn't seem genuine to me. –anemoneprojectors14:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "doesn't seem genuine"? Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 14:42, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pauline never took the name Macer and Abi has never had the name Cross, so I don't know how you can think they did. –anemoneprojectors14:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've just watched back Pauline's wedding episode on YouTube, and she took the name Macer. She was also credited as it from May 2006 until November 2006. Also, Abi took the name Cross in 2011, according to Sharon Marshall. Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 16:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pauline specifically stated that she was not going to take the name Macer. I was editing Wikipedia at the time and moved the page accordingly. It was promptly moved back for that reason. I had missed her saying it. Even if you are correct, how does 3 months as Macer trump 21 years as Fowler? According to Sharon Marshall where? –anemoneprojectors16:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Google has 120 results for '"Pauline Macer" EastEnders' and 31,300 for '"Pauline Fowler" EastEnders'. '"Abi Cross" EastEnders' has just 8 results which are largely unrelated. That tells me that Abi never took her mother's maiden name. Why would she? It's false. It never happened. –anemoneprojectors16:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Marshall stated that Abi had changed her name to Cross on an episode of This Morning in June 2011. Plus, I've just looked, and Google has 37, 760 results for "Pauline Macer" EastEnders' and only 26, 456 results for "Pauline Fowler" EastEnders'. Plus "Abi Cross" EastEnders' has 85, 578 results. That means that the articles should be changed to state this, and I will change them now while I get time. Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 17:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Well if Abi changed her name then it clearly was never referenced on screen or in credits (therefore didn't happen). I don't know why Sharon Marshall would say that. Nope, still only 120 results for '"Pauline Macer" EastEnders' and 8 for '"Abi Cross" EastEnders' You're wrong. Results will come up for 'Pauline Macer EastEnders' because the pages are mentioning both Pauline Fowler and Joe Macer, so the words "Pauline" and "Macer" are on the pages and will come up. This is not the correct way to check. No, you will not change the articles because it is false information. Pauline didn't take the name Macer and Abi didn't take the name Cross. –anemoneprojectors18:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're wrong. I'm absolutely right. I'll keep changing the articles until you admit you're wrong. Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 18:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is not the right attitude to take and not how Wikipedia works. I would suggest taking your views to the talk page, so others can weigh in and form a consensus. I would also suggest you have a read of WP:DE. - JuneGloom Talk 19:37, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I realise how serious disruptive editing can be, and I would like to apologise for my comments and making a fool of myself in general. However, I will still be reporting Anemone's comment "Sometimes I wonder if you're just here to cause trouble". Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 19:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tinamckintyre23. I could not help but notice your disruptive attitude. AP is clearly correct in what he says. I rarely speak on behalf of the wider WP:SOAPS community.. but I doubt anyone will agree with your proposed article moves. I think AP could be spot on - after all - this is a right disruptive drama developing right here. It really is not necessary or needed.Rain the 1 21:10, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know and I understand. I apologise. Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 21:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why you had to revert Eileen Grimshaw's infobox image either. The earlier version was very poor, yet you restored it without any given reason. AP, please can you delete the old versions of File:Eileen Grimshaw CS.jpg as there are too many. Leaving the one I uploaded though - which is I believe is a much better representation of the character.Rain the 1 23:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yep doing that now. –anemoneprojectors08:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep saying nasty stuff to me, like "She has proven to be a menace to Wikipedia" on the Janet Mitchell talk page. I want answers now. Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 16:49, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've already given three examples of your obvious vandalism. You're lucky you haven't been blocked. –anemoneprojectors09:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but I'm not vandalising anymore. I've realised I was wrong and I will make good contributions from now on. Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 09:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good then. In that case I take back my menace comment. –anemoneprojectors11:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of this?

Here. Very interesting. I remember reading somewhere else that radio stations had been informed that Leona was releasing another unnamed single from the album too.  — AARONTALK 15:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's interesting, yes, but we'll have to wait and see. Be nice to have another single, though I wasn't expecting one. –anemoneprojectors15:43, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've been hearing for months and months that a third single would be released. She said herself last October that she wants to release an up-tempo song, but said her preference was "Shake You Up". I really wanna set up some sort of petition or something to get "Glassheart" released as a single. It would do so well.  — AARONTALK 15:47, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I love "Shake You Up" though. –anemoneprojectors15:53, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I do too, but I think "Glassheart" has more of a dance edge to it. It's unlike anything she has ever done.  — AARONTALK 16:11, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

Thought I'd give the bot a chance to archive the previous help section. Would you be so kind as to move User:JuneGloom07/Suite to Suite française (film) for me and could you turn the categories on as well? I probably won't be online when you do the move and don't want to leave them as they are. - JuneGloom Talk 00:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done and  Doneanemoneprojectors08:47, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for that! - JuneGloom Talk 10:27, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed...

Hey AP, sorry but I couldn't help but notice this...it's obvious that this user should be punished...getting rather boring now. GeorgePing! 22:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC) [reply]

I think the SPI will lead to both users being blocked anyway. –anemoneprojectors06:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why will I be blocked? I told you I've stopped vandalising! Tinamckintyre23 (talk) 09:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry. Have a look at the SPI if you haven't already. I'm sure it's been linked on your talk page. –anemoneprojectors09:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But I'm not a sockpuppet, I promise you! Do you believe me? Tinamckintyre23 (talk) 09:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]