Talk:Inkspell
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Inkspell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Novels: Fantasy Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Children's literature Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||
|
Characters
I haven't read the book (I'm researching a purchase), but there seem to be a lot of spoilers in this section. I'm adding a 'spoiler warning' but smeone needs to fix the section. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.130.135.119 (talk) 13:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC).
Plot Summary issue
There seems to be misuse of the words "fatal wound" in the description of the wound sustained by the character "Mo". If the wound is a fatal wound, it results in death... Always results in death. If the contributor meant as very serious injury which may result in death. The proper words are "mortal wound". Which is defined as an injury which may result in death. Seattlefungus (talk) 20:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Spoiler
Just so people know, I've added a spoiler warning. Brianna 22:46, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles should not have spoilers. See WP:SPOILERS and WP:NODISCLAIMERS. If you don't want to read the spoilers, don't read the obvious-in-purpose Plot summary section. Eugeniu B +1 01:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
No, in general Wikipedia is spoiler-agnostic. Spoiler warnings are not appropriate for Wikipedia; Wikipedia's articles are inherently spoilery where appropriate and this will never be changed or softened. Call it the house style, if you will. 70.100.83.118 (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
why is being Merged to C Funke?
I think w should merge this, along with the other books in this seris, into Inkheart Triology bcause I think Its just too much to merg it into C Funke. PS sorry for th bad spelling th keyboard has a bit of problem 76.124.224.179 (talk) 01:36, 4 October 2013 (UTC)