Jump to content

Talk:Food

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 64.46.16.51 (talk) at 02:09, 30 November 2013 (Undid revision 583722154 by 99.226.44.228 (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former good article nomineeFood was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 25, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
March 28, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Template:Findnotice

1+1+1=2?

"Historically, people secured food through two methods: hunting and gathering, and agriculture." guys..really?wtf? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.64.149.209 (talk) 10:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Hunting and gathering" is one method — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.35.110.50 (talk) 22:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At the end of the page I tried those three links, however, my status doesn't allow me to make changes here in this article. The link to the FAO is not working anymore, I was searching the FAO site to find this marketing page, but I did not find it. Maybe http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/a0185e/a0185e00.htm might replace the link? And then I noticed that the link to the Cookbook is not working either. The right URL should be http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cookbook. Could anyone with the appropriate rights do the changes? Thanks ... Joheba (talk) 22:10, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Modern "types of food" ?

Shouldn't the "Types of food" list at the end contain also links to Novel food, Medical food, Functional food and Genetically modified food, maybe in a subsection ? The last two are mentioned in "Production", but I guess the "types" list is the best place to group the references for people interested in their differences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.4.195.150 (talk) 10:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good point! I agree with you. Types describes it at best. Jaxkhug (talk) 14:32, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Food marketing

The image shown for "food marketing" shows in the foreground non-food items (vitamin supplements and household items). It really doesn't do justice to the concept of packaged food. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.35.110.50 (talk) 22:49, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]