In my eight years of editing, I have grown to watch and maintain a greater realm of Wikipedia while hardly increasing time spent. I have gained this efficiency by adding to my tool belt, and I believe the Reviewer permission to be the next logical tool in my repertoire. My last was the Rollback right which I was granted several months ago; I've had zero accusations of misuse of the Rollback privilege in that time. In summary, I look forward to utilizing the relatively new Pending Changes feature for its intended purpose: preventing non-displayable content from ever making it to our readers' eyes. – voidxor(talk | contrib)23:21, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As other users have mentioned previously, I would like to be able to use the AFT5 system - I do a lot of Feedback Dashboard (for new users') work, am an instructor and graduate in the CVUA, have Rollback, and would love to be able to keep contributing to the Wiki and helping the newbies! UBStalk15:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I joined Wikipedia about four years ago and have held rollback privileges for some time. If given the opportunity to be a reviewer I believe I would be able to continue to fight vandalism more effectively. Jonathansuh (talk) 04:51, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I joined Wikipedia since 2010 and over the years I have learnt a lot about what Wikipedia stand for...I see a lapse in how Wikipedia covers the African scene(especially Nigeria) and if given the opportunity I want to ensure the information about the Nigeria Entertainment Industry and every other Nigeria data is in line with Wikipedia standard Darreg (talk) 15:12, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Unfortunately, with only 46 edits overall to Wikipedia, I do not have enough information to judge how well you would use the reviewer tool. As for expanding articles on African topics - Nigeria in particular, as you've said - that would be highly welcomed; fortunately, reviewer rights are not needed to add content, so feel free to begin working on those articles! Acalamari15:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am a Wikipedian with over 9 years experience and nearly 3000 edits (over 1000 in article space). I may not be a copious editor, but I am very familiar with Wikipedia editing policies. I'd simply like to approve an a pending edit for the Dunning-Kruger effect article. — TimL • talk12:21, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have been editing for just over a month with a focus on fighting vandalism, and I would like to be able to do so in pending changes. I have reviewed all of the criterion at becoming a reviewer, and believe that I fit them. I know that I haven't been editing for very long, but I hope that I am not considered too inexperienced. Thanks! Cogito-Ergo-Sum (14) (talk) 20:24, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have been productive using my Rollback right (mostly using Huggle but also manually) and patrolling new pages. I would like to clear the somewhat backlogged "Pending Changes" edits on the articles I come across. I also assist at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard and am routinely familiar with all content policies. --MrScorch6200 (tc) 01:17, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Happy New Year! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Not done Unfortunately, with only 46 edits overall to Wikipedia, I do not have enough information to judge how well you would use the reviewer tool. As for expanding articles on African topics - Nigeria in particular, as you've said - that would be highly welcomed; fortunately, reviewer rights are not needed to add content, so feel free to begin working on those articles! Acalamari 15:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)