Jump to content

User talk:Araz5152

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.100.168.97 (talk) at 03:30, 17 March 2014 (Taiyabi: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Araz5152, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Qutbi Bohra may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 1044475.aspx</ref> also spelt as '''Kutbi Bohra''' or '''Kutbi Vohra ''' or '''Qutbi Vohra''') is a sub sect of [[Dawoodi Bohra]]<ref>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawoodi_Bohra/</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mohammad Burhanuddin (49th Dai) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Syedna [[Abdul Husain Husamuddin]] appointed Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin as Mukasir e Dawat (The third highest position in [[Dawoodi Bohra]] sect. He was also the Wali of Mumbai.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abdul Qadir Najmuddin may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Later when the Mazoon e Dawat (second highest position in [[Dawoodi Bohra sect) passed away Syedna Tayyeb Zainuddin appointed the Mukasir e Dawat (third

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abdul Qadir Najmuddin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • be seen from the fact in Sironge he did a waaz (sermon). In this waaz he used the lisan ud dawat (language of [[Dawoodi Bohra]] sect and urdu together in a such a systematic manner not even a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Araz5152, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Araz5152! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your comment

Walaikum as salam sir, I read all of your message. I will try to keep my advice as brief as possible.
First, keep in mind that even if your article is significant and notable, it's not urgent that it be published now. Theoretically if you wait a few weeks, things will still be fine. The world won't come to an end.
Second, understand that Wikipedia is in need of more editors but it takes time to learn the ropes. If this article is quite significant, then it may be a good idea to keep it on hold for now and edit other, unrelated topics in order to gain some experience in how this is done.
Listen, I edit during my down time at the office so I have to log off now. It's possible to work a lot of these things out but as it is, I think you need to take more time to become familiar with how Wikipedia works. If there is any foul play with this article, there are ways and policies to stop that. Wikipedia:Teahouse can assist new editors as well. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changing your own comments on Talk pages

I'm trying to clean up the Qutbi Bohra Talk page. It's a real mess of overwritten, unsigned, and changed edits by various users. When I'm done please take a look at it and verify that I have not inadvertantly changed anything you contributed. And please read WP:REDACT before modifying comments you have previously made to Talk pages. It's very confusing when you insert comments into the middle of something you have previously posted. Meters (talk) 23:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished cleaning up the Talk page. Please check that i have not made any mistakes. Meters (talk) 02:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taher Saifuddin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DGG ( talk ) 18:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Before you start throwing around baseless accusations of vandalism read WP:VANDAL. Then read up on neutral point of view. Prior to my edits the article was nothing more than a hagiography of the subject written in a very non-neutral point of view. In fact it needs additional clean up.--ukexpat (talk) 01:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Once again my edits are NOT VANDALISM and I resent you characterising them as such.--ukexpat (talk) 02:36, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop undo my edits. Khuzaima Qutbuddin was Mazoon, as there is mention of the title of Mukasir after Husain Husamuddin. It's a fact and no one can deny it. I've put reliable reference. Ftutocdg (talk) 12:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at Taher Saifuddin. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ukexpat (talk) 01:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mohammad Burhanuddin (49th Dai) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • of a Da'i al-Mutlaq and appointed him as the raas ul hudood (a position of esteem in [Dawoodi Bohra sect).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mohammad Burhanuddin (49th Dai) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Saifee Mahal. This place was later purchased by his son 51st Da'i al-Mutlaq Syedna Taher Saifuddin] who made it the House of the Da'i al-Mutlaq.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Qutbi Bohra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qutbi Bohra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qutbi Bohra (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Summichum (talk) 08:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 10 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Qutbi Bohra, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. This diff. Sam Sailor Sing 00:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Taher Saifuddin. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sam Sailor Sing 00:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What you added into your article is helpful for the readers.. It will be better if you start writing into Taiyabi section about the belief, prayers, etc.. I mean those things which are common to all Mustaali people.. So that you will be better understood by the other groups since you represent nearly 0.1% of the all muslims, this Taiyabi section should be re-written together with the other Daudi Bohras very nicely. Right now just divisions, splits and other disputes are mentioned which does not look nice!! Thanks again for your contributions.. 68.100.168.97 (talk) 03:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]