Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Rollback
Please familiarize yourself with Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback before making a request.Misuse of the feature, even if unintentional or in good faith, may give cause for it to be removed. |
To make a request, please follow the instructions below:
NOTE: It is unlikely that users with fewer than 200 mainspace edits will be granted the use of this tool. Please consider enrolling at the Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy to learn more about handling vandalism.
Requests that do not meet the above criteria will be delayed or removed. |
Sorry, please be aware that unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Administrator notation templates
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This template is used to answer requests for permissions, especially the rollback user right. ::{{subst:RFPR|option}} ~~~~
|
User:Fdizile
- Fdizile (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- Hello, I am requesting the Rollback Permission, because I wish to further help with counter-vandalisim efforts. Why: The main reason in my opinion, is I have been doing some recent edit "revisioning/reverting" I feel that having the Rollback ability would allow me to further help in (as I previously stated) counter-vandalisim and prevention. Thank you, Fdizile Fdizile (developer) 21:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: - An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request. ///EuroCarGT 23:50, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only 13 edits to mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU and when you have made 200 or so edits to articles you may wish to enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:23, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
User:AntanO
- AntanO (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I have focused to contribute to some of other sister projects than en.wiki, and recently I have increased my contribution here. Therefore, Rollback rights would help me to function with effectiveness. I am well aware of Rollback rights and its usage, and I have such rights in other Wikimedia projects. AntonTalk 07:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
User:FDMS4
- FDMS4 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- Had to undo vandalism several times recently when reviewing Pending Changes; already have the right on Commons, Wikidata and the German Wikipedia. Thank you. FDMS 4 18:46, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
User:Magnolia677
- Magnolia677 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- As my watchlist gets longer, I find I'm spending more and more time reverting vandalism. I just did a 3-step revert on the U.S. Customs and Border Protection article, and before that did a 5-step revert to the Joe A. Rector article. And once...I got half way though a 6-step revert when the vandal added another! Reverting vandalism is our duty, like laundry, but there's always an easier way. I'm requesting rollback for no other reason than it would give me more time to do what I love, which is work on articles. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 03:16, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
User:TheChampionMan1234
- TheChampionMan1234 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I am familiar with reverting vandalism, new page patrolling, welcoming etc. Therefore, I would like to try out Huggle, which requires rollback permissions (I am already farmiliar with Twinkle, so it should be alright. TheChampionMan1234 07:11, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
User:Tutelary
- Tutelary (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I have been quite sufficient and adamant about protesting and reverting vandalism. I think the majority of what I like to do on Wikipedia is revert and warn people who leave vandalistic edits, as well as just scroll through the recent changes page and try to find it. I believe that being granted permission with Rollbacker would provide me with the right to use tools like WP:HUGGLE and WP:STIKI in order to better achieve my goal of reverting and removing vandalistic edits. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 19:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
User:Evanh2008
- Evanh2008 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I held rollback rights for about a year and a half in 2012 and 2013. That year and a half happens to be non-consecutive because I was involved in a brief dispute over whether edits I had reverted using Rollback were vandalism or part of a content dispute. I maintained the former, and had a good amount of support in that opinion; the rights were restored within a day. About a year later, I requested that my rollback rights be removed, as I was gradually becoming less active at Wikipedia, and in fact believed that I had used rollback in a content dispute, albeit inadvertently (I can't recall what the article was). I am back, active, and doing battle with vandals now, so I would like a chance to prove myself worthy of rollback privileges. Thanks, in advance, for considering. Evan (talk|contribs) 03:17, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
User:TCMemoire
- TCMemoire (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I have been fighting vandalism since November 2013 and have been using Twinkle for months. I have obtained a great deal of experience during this time. I would like to use other tools, such as Huggle, to fight vandalism more quickly. I am well aware of the vandalism and rollback policies and guidelines. Thank you! – TCMemoire 20:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
User:Jamie Tubers
- Jamie Tubers (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I've had to revert vandalism recently. I find it pretty tasking to start reverting consecutive edits by the same IP one after the other' when I could've just done it all at once. I'm familiar with rollback rules and guidelines. Thanks Jamie Tubers (talk) 15:58, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Not done. I've just blocked this user for copyvios. MER-C 12:55, 20 April 2014 (UTC)