Jump to content

User talk:Epicgenius

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 46.208.12.44 (talk) at 13:10, 25 April 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.










Badnera railway station

Hi there,

I had noticed that you had reverted an edit at Badnera railway station which is quite similar to what i had done earlier in the day. Is it possible to check if 106.79.153.237 & Prasanna Gajanan Dudhe are the same individual & do you think page protection is in order or is it too early for it? Thanks. Superfast1111 (talk) 14:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, not yet. There is only two reverts so far, not enough to warrant protection. Usually, protection only comes after four reverts. Epicgenius (talk) 15:10, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do edits made on wikipedia commons count towards your total number of edits for the purpose of barnstar awards?? Superfast1111 (talk) 15:38, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure myself, but I think that global edits require "global" barnstars. Epicgenius (talk) 15:47, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you able to connect to STiki?

Just curious to know whether you're able to access STiki at the moment. I can't seem to connect right now and wanted to make sure it's not something on my end. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:28, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@K6ka: Yep, I'm having the same problem. Thanks for the message; I hadn't launched STiki until you told me, and I got an "Error" message when I launched it. Epicgenius (talk) 16:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changes?

Hi. I got your message & thank you for writing. I noticed you changed the name from what I wrote as Flowering Gum Flower, back to "Gum Flower". It's actually called a Flowering Gum as gum trees don't generally flower. There is one gum that does flower, hence the name. And this is the actual 'picture' used on the $5.00 note. Being about Australian dollars I thought that I would correct it. Especially seems it's also our ONLY flowering gum which could lead to confusion with being just 'gum flower'.

I also read on the Edit history that you thought this was "test/vandalism"? I am not sure what that actually means in this instance. If you don't mind me asking? I am still trying to learn all that there is to know about contributing to Wikipedia.

Thanks. I think I put this in? I hope this works. Redrecks

Hello, Epicgenius. You have new messages at Redrecks's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please forgive any errors in this message being sent. I hope I have sent it to the correct page?

Yes, this is the correct page. I've fixed your talkback. I will get back to you shortly. Epicgenius (talk) 16:28, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Station layout has a first line that says "does not stop here" and I find that a little confusing since the Atlantic City Line does stop there. If we want to illustrate that there is another non stopping track running through the station we should find another expression. Perhaps through track would be a better choice, or passing track since the line returns to single track in both directions. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make a better layout showing the passing track. Epicgenius (talk) 18:06, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

VisualEditor newsletter—April 2014

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has mostly worked on performance improvements, image settings, and preparation for a simplified citation template tool in its own menu.

  • In an oft-requested improvement, VisualEditor now displays red links (links to non-existent pages) in the proper color. Links to sister projects and external URLs are still the same blue as local links.
  • You can now open templates by double-clicking them or by selecting them and pressing  Return.  This also works for references, images, galleries, mathematical equations, and other "nodes".
  • VisualEditor has been disabled for pages that were created as translations of other pages using the Translate extension (common at Meta and MediaWiki.org). If a page has been marked for translation, you will see a warning if you try to edit it using VisualEditor.
  • When you try to edit protected pages with VisualEditor, the full protection notice and most recent log entry are displayed. Blocked users see the standard message for blocked users.
  • The developers fixed a bug that caused links on sub-pages to point to the wrong location.
  • The size-changing controls in the advanced settings section of the media or image dialog were simplified further. VisualEditor's media dialog supports more image display styles, like borderless images.
  • If there is not enough space on your screen to display all of the tabs (for instance, if your browser window is too narrow), the second edit tab will now fold into the drop-down menu (where the "Move" item is currently housed). On the English Wikipedia, this moves the "Edit beta" tab into the menu; on most projects, it moves the "Edit source" tab. This is only enabled in the default Vector skin, not for Monobook users. See this image for an example showing the "Edit source" and "View history" tabs after they moved into the drop-down menu.
  • After community requests, VisualEditor has been deployed as an opt-in feature at Meta and on the French Wikinews.
The drop-down menu is on the right, next to the search box.

Looking ahead:  A new, locally controlled menu of citation templates will put citations immediately in front of users. You will soon be able to see the Table of Contents while editing. Support for upright image sizes (preferred for accessibility) is being developed. In-line language setting (dir="rtl") will be offered as a Beta Feature soon. Looking further out, the developers are also working on support for viewing and editing hidden HTML comments. It will be possible to upload images to Commons from inside VisualEditor.

If you have questions or suggestions for future improvements, or if you encounter problems, please let everyone know by posting a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback or by joining the office hours on Monday, 19 May 2014 at 18:00 UTC. If you'd like to get this on your own page, subscribe at Wikipedia:VisualEditor#Newsletter for English Wikipedia only or at meta:VisualEditor/Newsletter for any project. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New York City Subway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • has CBTC, with installation on [[IRT Flushing Line|another line]] underway. The BMT Canarsie Line] on which the [[L (New York City Subway service)|L]] subway service runs, was chosen for CBTC pilot
  • of US$1.1 billion in 2009. Fare increases (three times from 2008 to 2010) and service reductions (including the elimination of two part-time subway services, the {{NYCS|V}} and {{NYCS|W}}. Several

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of the New York City Subway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {Main|History of the IRT subway before 1918}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Liberty Park (Manhattan) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • is planned to have a capacity of 750 people and will be the roof of the Vehicular Security Center]]. A "living wall" will be located on the Liberty Street [[facade]], which would be "essentially a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

asmallworld

Hey, how's it going? I just saw you reverted two of my edits to asmallworld. I think in general the some of the changes are ok. I would like to keep the part about offering several hundred rides out of a large membership, because I think that keeps the sentence NPOV, since the IP address which added that sentence seemed biased towards asmallworld, and the fact that several hundred rides may have been given (despite no citation) is balanced by reporting the membership total for perspective. I will re-add this numbering, but will change it to be NPOV, take a look and let me know what you think, cool? I added the quote to give specificity to the claim, which in the source cited and actually appears in many media sources - but I am fine with keeping it out. (Mostlyoksorta (talk) 19:20, 24 April 2014 (UTC))[reply]

I'll look over the article soon. Epicgenius (talk) 01:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sony Music Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ragtime Revert

Hi! I just had a first time editor complain to me about your reversion of her edit to the Ragtime (novel) synopsis. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ragtime_%28novel%29&diff=596927630&oldid=596921632). Would you mind giving a little more explanation of your revert? She was very discouraged by it, and some more explanation might encourage her to remain an editor. --EdSaperia (talk) 12:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@EdSaperia: I apologize for not giving an explanation. I was going to say that certain parts of the synopsis before my reversion did not have a Neutral Point of View. For example, I think that "the Eastern European socialist immigrant" is more biased than the previous version, "bereaved Jewish single father". Some of the other edits are good, such as the first paragraph of the edit, which goes, "Into this secure setup comes first an abandoned black child, then his sorrowful depressed mother Sarah...." Epicgenius (talk) 12:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is the editor. I appreciate that you expect the words 'socialist' and 'immigrant' to be controversial but in fact Tateh in the novel repeatedly self-identifies as a socialist, and he is an immigrant from Eastern Europe. The novel as a whole has been described as an elegy for socialism as it succumbs to capitalism, representing the root of what we now live in; late capitalism/postmodern era. Doctorow himself has been described as one of the only serious leftist contemporary American writers. Tateh's socialism is not only completely central to the plot of the novel itself, but to all critical understanding of it. His immigrant status is similarly crucial to the founding of America. Iirc Tateh was in fact not Jewish, or if he was it was not central to the plot; it is Houdini's character who is definitively Jewish.

The second edit you mention above as being 'good' I find hard to believe was me. If I used such a tautology, it was in error.

The naming of the character from the very first line of the plot synopsis is also erroneous. It is 'Younger Brother', not 'Mother's Younger Brother', and 'the little boy' does not remain unnamed; he is named by his familial relationship status as with all the other members - as 'the little boy'. Crucially, 'the little girl' is deliberately not capitalised in the novel, to maintain the critical parallels between the three families.

It is frustrating to have one's edits reverted by someone who obviously has not read/understood the novel. Literature is usually specific in its themes, and explaining these themes is not expressing bias.