I have created many pages (about 1000) in 5 years in Wikipedia projects (English, German and Persian) (Subjects:Chemistry,Journalism,People). I think that I have enough experience to start the pages correctly .Kind regards--Sahehco (talk) 14:32, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not doneSahehco your articles created to deleted pages ratio is impressive (about 50:0). Over 1000 pages on fa-wikipedia is impressive also. I do have some concerns however, Blacktop, is a second article really necessary? Bernhard Keppler is effectively an unsourced BLP (at best there is a primary source), and Black Kashk (granted over a year ago) is only sourced to fa-wikipedia. Your work on creating Iranian newspapers is going well, keep up the good work.--kelapstick(bainuu) 16:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've created 63 mainspace articles and have a very good understanding of the GNG and MOS with respect to the creation of new articles. Depending on my free time, I'll create 5–10 articles per year. X96lee15 (talk) 16:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I really don't care if I get this right or not. If you're the paranoid type who believes I may be an axe murder,^Worded stronger than I meant feel free to decline. I don't have that strong an argument and won't get my feelings hurt if it's declined. I may even ask for this permission to be removed if I ever stop "fixing stuff" and start writing articles. I just don't think my pages are really of the type to need to be "checked"; they're generally templates, template documentation, redirects, user warnings, to-do lists, or tracking categories: (past 30 days, currently in NPP)·(total) I also notice NPP is backlogged, majorly. I don't create that much but I don't think I've ever created anything worth checking, really. Again, I totally understand if anybody declines this privilege. Meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 01:54, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Autopatrolled is for substantial article creators to reduce the workload of new page patrollers but not for the patrollers themselves. ///EuroCarGT20:37, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have created close to 200 articles, many of those from the past year or so. I have a strong knowledge of notability guidelines and avoid creating articles for borderline-notable subjects. I make sure all my articles are stubs before creating and then mostly expand them swiftly to start/B-class. It would be good to take some of the burden of my creations off the new page patrolers. Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk20:47, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I want to begin creating large number of film stubs daily, and having autopatrolled rights will not only encourage me to continue but also save other Wikipedians the stress of patrolling hundreds of articles from an editor that currently abides strictly by the 5 pillars of Wikipedia. I also have a very good understanding of what Wikipedia deem as "notable". Thank you. Darreg (talk) 07:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I perfectly understand your concerns. Blogs (like blogspot & wordpress), Facebook and Twitter are NOT reliable sources and should be avoided always. Also all notable articles should have at LEAST one independent source to promote neutrality. I will remedy my EARLY citation mistakes on Wikipedia by working on them right-away. Thanks Darreg (talk) 19:46, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have created at least around 50 new articles, and I increase the creation of new pages. Therefore, I want to autopatrol new articles that I'm going to be created. AntonTalk02:36, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done You don't need 'autopatrolled' user right to patrol new pages, it is intended for users who create new articles. You've created only five pages, poorly referenced at that. Please familiarize yourself with WP:Autopatrolled. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 16:03, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Sahehco your articles created to deleted pages ratio is impressive (about 50:0). Over 1000 pages on fa-wikipedia is impressive also. I do have some concerns however, Blacktop, is a second article really necessary? Bernhard Keppler is effectively an unsourced BLP (at best there is a primary source), and Black Kashk (granted over a year ago) is only sourced to fa-wikipedia. Your work on creating Iranian newspapers is going well, keep up the good work.--kelapstick(bainuu) 16:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Done --kelapstick(bainuu) 16:10, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Request withdrawn Communication error: I was under the impression redirects had to be checked. Meteor sandwich yum (talk • contribs) 17:08, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
