User talk:Frenchman101

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! the panda ₯’ 19:29, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Your recent editing history at Nash Grier shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. bonadea [[S[pecial:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] talk 18:03, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Nash_Grier. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Chillum 18:27, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reverts in question are:

Before warning: [1][2][3]

After warning: [4].

There are also more reverts prior to those that were not considered in this block. Chillum 18:28, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you were blocked for edit warring over the birth date, is it really such a good idea to remove the birth date again for your first edit after the block expired? —C.Fred (talk) 19:40, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already reported for violation immediately after block expiration. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:46, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, while this edit is in order—I checked the sources and they do report that the video was uploaded in April 2013—it's a revert of a good-faith edit and would count toward the three revert rule. —C.Fred (talk) 19:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So, I am not going to be banned again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frenchman101 (talk • contribs)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Nash Grier. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 20:07, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Frenchman101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I repeal being blocked because I CEASED my edit war today. I to amite I reverted the edit ONCE in the last hour, but It was ONLY ONCE and I will did not do it again. The rule says, the three revert rule, that if you revert and edit more than three times you get blocked for 24 hours. I only REVERTED It ONCE. I did not revert THREE times.

I feel this blocking is unjust and I ask you, or whoever blocked me to unblock me.

Thank you,

Frenchman101 (talk) 20:17, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I repeal being blocked because I CEASED my edit war today. I to amite I reverted the edit ONCE in the last hour, but It was ONLY ONCE and I will did not do it again. The rule says, the three revert rule, that if you revert and edit more than three times you get blocked for 24 hours. I only REVERTED It ONCE. I did not revert THREE times. 
I feel this blocking is unjust and I ask you, or whoever blocked me to unblock me.

Thank you,

 [[User:Frenchman101|Frenchman101]] ([[User talk:Frenchman101#top|talk]]) 20:17, 26 July 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I repeal being blocked because I CEASED my edit war today. I to amite I reverted the edit ONCE in the last hour, but It was ONLY ONCE and I will did not do it again. The rule says, the three revert rule, that if you revert and edit more than three times you get blocked for 24 hours. I only REVERTED It ONCE. I did not revert THREE times. 
I feel this blocking is unjust and I ask you, or whoever blocked me to unblock me.

Thank you,

 [[User:Frenchman101|Frenchman101]] ([[User talk:Frenchman101#top|talk]]) 20:17, 26 July 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I repeal being blocked because I CEASED my edit war today. I to amite I reverted the edit ONCE in the last hour, but It was ONLY ONCE and I will did not do it again. The rule says, the three revert rule, that if you revert and edit more than three times you get blocked for 24 hours. I only REVERTED It ONCE. I did not revert THREE times. 
I feel this blocking is unjust and I ask you, or whoever blocked me to unblock me.

Thank you,

 [[User:Frenchman101|Frenchman101]] ([[User talk:Frenchman101#top|talk]]) 20:17, 26 July 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Check the history of Nash Grier again. You made two reverts today. Do you see that and agree that you did? —C.Fred (talk) 20:22, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But WHY would TWO reverts get me blocked for a WEEK?? The first one was silly of me, actually, and the SECOND one, YOU, yes, YOU even agreed with me! Remember, I reverted the date back to normal? Can you help back me up on this? I feel me being block is unjust and unfair. The wikipedia rules says you get blocked after THREE reverts NOT TWO C.Fred (talk) Shirik (Shirik)