Jump to content

Talk:3PAR

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 77.94.137.195 (talk) at 12:02, 5 August 2015 (→‎Some content...: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconCalifornia: San Francisco Bay Area Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Apparent NPOV, especially in the 'History' section

The sentence "3PAR has been recognized as a pioneer and champion for a significantly more efficient mechanism for storage..." looks as blatant violation of the WP:NPOV policy. Also, the article needs references everywhere to avoid accusations of having original research: Its subject is important enough. Regards, --AVM (talk) 18:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another reference article from Infoworld posted refering to 3PAR as a thin provisioning pioneer. please remove objection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.126.187.197 (talkcontribs)
The above comment came from a 3PAR IP address, as did many of these edits including the creation of the article by User:Utilitystorage. I am cleaning up and NPOV-ing the article now. --SFoskett (talk) 14:16, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article lists HP as competitor to 3par. This is not the case now that 3par is part of HP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.152.2.12 (talk)

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessaryily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=8555D03B-5D53-414D-B01D-09A827C641CC
    Triggered by \bcbronline\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 00:27, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some content...

This article contains a load of useless buzzwords that mean nothing and ultimately fail to convey what the company offers that their competitors do not. For the record, it's a linux-based managment system that is capable of reorganizing RAID strips around disks automatically, without administrative intervention.77.94.137.195 (talk) 12:02, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]