Jump to content

User talk:203.109.161.2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 203.109.161.2 (talk) at 19:42, 6 August 2015 (→‎August 2015). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


July 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ceramics has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ceramics was changed by 203.109.161.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975778 on 2015-07-12T04:42:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gmcbjames. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Gmcbjames (talk) 17:12, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 203.109.161.2, has made unhelpful edits, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Gmcbjames (talk) 17:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 203.109.161.2. You have new messages at Gmcbjames's talk page.
Message added 18:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Gmcbjames (talk) 18:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Red pill and blue pill. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 01:45, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mithun Chakraborty filmography because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 13:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at 2013 Liberty Flames football team, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 20:41, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TV Azteca telenovelas

This template well as this, is not as big as Template:Nickelodeon original series and Nicktoons, so please let it be like this.--Philip J Fry • (talk) 03:15, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. Yoy have to look at it from how someone reading the page sees it. 203.109.161.2 (talk) 03:18, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So your argument is not valid. That part says that it should be as you say?, case send here?.--Philip J Fry • (talk) 03:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
English is my native language but I do not understand what you are saying. 203.109.161.2 (talk) 03:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
By what I like to be generating editions wars, you know what?, you want, I am not going to end up blocked because look at you funny.--Philip J Fry • (talk) 03:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do you now that you don't understand?, clear because you want truth?.--Philip J Fry • (talk) 03:26, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ill

Re Lutherkirche: {{ill}} is a highly useful template, perhaps read WP:QAIPOST#Interlanguage link. Of course the interlanguage link is there for the church, but it doesn't help to easily show that an individual person is notable enough to have an article in German (do you seriously expect a reader who may have trouble reading German to search a longish German article for that?), to make that article accessible with on click, and to enable the creation of an English article with another click. I like to pick my topics on Sunday and felt pushed to create those three. Please don't do that again. - Why you also removed {{lang}}, which only helps people using a screenreader and is not even noticed by others, remains your secret. - Enjoy the day, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:23, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree with Gerda. I use those links all the time; they're quick and easy, and I've translated many a German article that way. Drmies (talk) 14:49, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stub tags

Please stop removing stub tags on articles that clearly stubs. If an article has no real layout and the text is limited to a dew dozen words, it should be categorized as a stub. When you remove the stub tag, it becomes more difficult for other editors to find articles to expand. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:46, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to stop edit warring to remove stub tags. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:53, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
why? 203.109.161.2 (talk) 01:54, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've already explained to you why. According to WP:STUB, these articles are stubs. You're being disruptive now, and you could end up blocked if you continue. Removing {{official website}} is petty disruption. If this continues, you'll just end up at WP:ANI or WP:AIV. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:56, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What I am doing makes no difference to WP. Neither of us know what is right or wrong here. 203.109.161.2 (talk) 02:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If it makes no difference, then stop doing it. I've warned you twice now, and you're closing in on a third warning. If you continue edit warring and blanking, I'll take this an administrative noticeboard. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:03, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This edit is clearly disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:16, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to call it a stub then you have to do it properly. 203.109.161.2 (talk) 02:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Gmcbjames (talk) 06:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
What I am doing makes no difference to WP. Neither of us know what is right or wrong here. 203.109.161.2 (talk) 07:11, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, what you are doing does make a difference to WP. We are here to build and make an encyclopedia better. Wrong edits - which may end up having this IP address blocked - are:
If you do not know what is "right" or "wrong," then you shouldn't be making edits on WP. Make an effort to work with other editors - many have reached out to you already. It may be time to take a time out and to reflect on why you are editing WP. Gmcbjames (talk) 18:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Gmcbjames, I'd appreciate it if there were less unexplained reverting and templating and more actual communication. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree @Drmies:. I get the impression that just because my edits are from an IP address I am getting a hard time. Some of the reverts done by @Gmcbjames: are unjustified and are a step backwards. This one and this one are two of the more egregious cases. 203.109.161.2 (talk) 19:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:203.109.161.2&oldid=674885537"