Jump to content

User talk:Skyraider1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 166.172.57.173 (talk) at 20:40, 21 September 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Don't know how to get you info. However there are two F105 thunderbolts in Tallapoosa GA in the veterans park.

.

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Good luck, and have fun. FWIW, Bzuk (talk) 01:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Season's tidings!

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon tardiness

Pardon my late response to your act of kindness. I've been so caught up in editing, I just blanked out on it. Well, belated sincere Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 05:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I just want to thank you for your modifications on Sikorsky H-34, my English is rusted... lol --Friday83260 (On discute ?) 06:30, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


About Ion Thruster Edit

Hi, there I have seen you removed an edit about the propulsive efficiency for the Ion thruster which I posted a few weeks ago (I was an anonymous user then). Maybe my edit is not perfect, however the paragraph in this article is completely irrelevant (you can also look at the talk section, somebody else noted it), for somebody with a degree in physics there is no such thing as a "vehicle velocity", velocity is always relative to a reference. The formulas used within the paragraph are formulas which are derived for propulsive efficiency within an athmosphere (in an athmosphere it is common practice to name vehicle velocity its velocity relative to the athmosphere). In a vaccum (in space) this formula is no longer valid, and Ion thrusters are used almost exclusively in space (due to their small thrusts).

Maybe you may think that I do not have any reliable sources (altough some good physics books could do), but then remove this propulsive efficiency paragraph which has really nothing to do in this article then. Sjaure (talk) 12:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Skyraider1, I noticed your edit. To explain what I did: the Camilla the Chicken page refers to "Camilla", hence my edit. In the meantime I changed the link on the page to Camilla Corona. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 04:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation, Lotje- that makes a little more sense now. Out of context, I was having a difficult time understanding the connection between a chicken (didn't realize SDO had any sort of rubber chicken mascot) and a solar observatory- I almost didn't realize your edit was in good faith. Changing the link on the page to Camilla Corona, as you did, is probably more useful to a reader in the long run anyway. Thanks again for the note. Cheers! Skyraider1 (talk) 10:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plasma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

bruh

Just stop. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolgainz (talkcontribs) 15:58, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]