Jump to content

User talk:I dream of horses

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Email this user
4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sunshine Suzy (talk | contribs) at 22:53, 9 November 2015 (→‎help: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Out of vuriosity, what was the point of the China Jinping Underground Laboratory "cleanup"?

I'm looking over the changes, and nothing looks better, so I'm somewhat sincerely confused about the point of this edit. I'm thinking of reverting some of them, but I'd like to discuss it first. I want ahead and reverted the whole thing, but I'm willing to be persuaded. Could you enlighten me?

  1. Putting the {{redirect}} hatnote before the infobox drops the infobox down a line, which looks uglier, especially as the hatnote is short and doesn't need the width.
  2. Substituting {{Citation needed}} for {{Fact}} is a complete no-op to the rendered text and clutters editing a bit. It's not exactly worse, but definitely no better.
  3. When I have some footnotes with a {{rp}} suffix, I prefer to put that at the end, because [1][2]:3 is more legible than [1]:3[2]. If both have pages ([1]:3[2]:4), it can't be helped, but otherwise putting the one with a page number suffix at the end makes it a bit easier to read. (Maybe [1]:3 [2]?)

None of these are significant enough I'd be likely to make an edit to an article just to make those changes, which is why I wonder why you did. Can you explain?

Thanks! 71.41.210.146 (talk) 11:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was using AWB, which is something that is explicitly used for minor edits. All of the edits I did were to make articles look standardized, both from the edit box and outside of it. I also couldn't see that what I did only had the effect of making the article uglier. --I dream of horses (My edits) @ 15:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Disability delsort category

Hi: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 19 October 2015 for Disability-related articles, located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disability. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America1000 18:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Northamerica1000: Thank you for taking the time to tell me. --I dream of horses (My edits) @ 01:15, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine). Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cloth Diaper Page

Wow- you are fast I dream of horses!

I though it'd help other moms if they saw what some of the cloth diaper products are. I was hoping to do it for a lot of the Cloth Diaper page.

I feel like moms often don't know anything about cloth diapering, and that this was good information for an encyclopedia.

What do you think?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skidro111 (talkcontribs) 00:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Skidro111: Perhaps put the link at the bottom, underneath an "External links" header.
Huggle helps me edit quickly. --I dream of horses (My edits) @ 00:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timeflies

I just added that they were on Youtube. It is were Ifound them. To bbe honest I don't know where else to find them. I was trying to help. Sellie stewart (talk) 03:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sellie stewart: Typically, we don't use emoticons. Maybe put a link to their official YouTube channel under an external links section. --I dream of horses (My edits) @ 11:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WKNC-FM

Hi, you reverted my change to WKNC FM. I can understand why you did not find it constructive; however, the information that is currently there is absolutely false, and leaving such information up on Wikipedia is not particularly constructive. If my change was not useful, then it should, at the very least, be removed. Saying that the "K" stands for "Kollege" comes off one as clearly wrong but second as condescending to the actual nature behind the name. Does this make sense?

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.76.177.125 (talk) 19:20, November 9, 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps just remove that line entirely. If you get reverted, start a discussion. --I dream of horses (My edits) @ 22:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

help

Hi. Thank you for offering to help me. I left a message on my page. @I dream of horses: