Jump to content

Talk:Iraq War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aido (talk | contribs) at 02:08, 3 February 2016 (Gave link to where message came from.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Former good article nomineeIraq War was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 1, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
February 14, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee


Lancet survey

Given the near-universal agreement by government bodies and scientific observers that it's an inaccurate study, why is it till listed in the casualty box? The other estimates are much closer to each other and have much more solid support by various professionals. 69.121.144.8 (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 16 external links on Iraq War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not a WAR

Congress never declared war against Iraq so this needs to be called Iraq Invasion or Iraq Police Action — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.33.195.254 (talk) 04:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Talk:Iraq War Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US Senate" --Aidoboy (talk) 02:08, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Australia: 2,000 or 22,000?

Someone changed the Australian involvement from 2,000 to 22,000 in the summary but not in the later text -- without leaving a reference (and identifying themselves only with an IP address). Sadly, the only citation I could find was a broken link. I will revert this recent change. I hope that someone can find a working link -- or the the broken link magically fixes itself (e.g., by a server returning to service). DavidMCEddy (talk) 08:32, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]