Jump to content

User talk:SciRealm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SciRealm (talk | contribs) at 16:27, 30 May 2016 (Reliable sources). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, SciRealm! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! –Gladamastalk 00:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Reliable sources

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mass–energy equivalence, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 07:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Wikipedia is not a textbook — see wp:NOTTEXTBOOK, and of course see also our policiy about wp:original research. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 08:04, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks already for this source. Can please add the page too? Then I'll cast it into a templated {{cite book}}. - DVdm (talk) 10:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done: [1]. - DVdm (talk) 11:04, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mass–energy equivalence. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Note that I have removed your addition again: [2]. You analysis ("Working out the math...") does not appear in my copy of Carrol, nor in my 1st edition of Rindler. We can only report what is explicitlly in the sources. We are not allowed to draw our conclusions, or make syntheses—see wp:SYNTH. We have to stricly confine ourserlves to what is actually in the sources. Again, Wikipedia is not a textbook. Please keep that in mind. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 15:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: see also Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics#Sources at Four-gradient. - DVdm (talk) 16:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi DVdm,
Perhaps I don't understand - does this not fall under the routine math part?
"Routine calculations do not count as original research, provided there is consensus among editors that the result of the calculation is obvious, correct, and a meaningful reflection of the sources. Basic arithmetic, such as adding numbers, converting units, or calculating a person's age are some examples of routine calculations"
If there is a specific line you don't like I can probably find a reference to it. I studied theoretical physics and I have lots of physics books... SciRealm (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]