User talk:Summichum

Welcome and have talk, and refrain from posting template messages here.

Summichum (talk) 08:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your report at AN3

Hi. You posted this where you claim that another user has a COI, and is associated with the subject. Can you please provide diffs for these accusations? Keep in mind that we have a policy regarding outing which you can read more about on Wikipedia:Harassment#Posting_of_personal_information. Bjelleklang - talk 08:25, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bjelleklang Yes in his initial wikipedia pages he had posted all his personal details which were removed later after the succession controversy.

This shows him in customary attire unique to dawoodi bohra clergy: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rukn950&oldid=602231414#My_Links

And here he claims to be strongly dawood bohra: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_72#Reply_of_Summichum_allegations

This is the 2 nd time the 3RR request was denied inspite of clear case of 3RR edit violation both the times , hope this request is modified as a deterrent.Summichum (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I dont mind if other 3rd party editors who are invested in the bohra articles like anupmehra and qwertyus agree to the COI tag. Summichum (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Posting of personal information[edit source]

Shortcuts:
WP:OUTING WP:PRIVACY WP:DOX "WP:OUTING" redirects here. For the alternate meaning of outing, as in excursion, see Wikipedia:Meetup. "WP:PRIVACY" redirects here. For the Wikimedia privacy policy, see Wikimedia:Privacy policy. See also: Doxing
Posting another editor's personal information is harassment, unless that person had voluntarily posted his or her own information, or links to such information, on Wikipedia. Personal information includes legal name, date of birth, identification numbers, home or workplace address, job title and work organisation, telephone number, email address, other contact information, or photograph whether any such information is accurate or not. Posting such information about another editor is an unjustifiable and uninvited invasion of privacy and may place that editor at risk of harm outside of their activities on Wikipedia. This applies to the personal information of both editors and non-editors. Any edit that "outs" someone must be reverted promptly, followed by a request for oversight to delete that edit from Wikipedia permanently. If an editor has previously posted their own personal information but later redacted it, it should not be repeated on Wikipedia; although references to still-existing, self-disclosed information is not considered outing. If the previously posted information has been removed by oversight, then repeating it on Wikipedia is considered outing.

for your reference summichum Rukn950 (talk) 17:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!Rukn950 (talk) 13:06, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Dai of Dawoodi Bohra, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Idris and Hatim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Dai of Dawoodi Bohra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

la

I hope you understand that while captioning a photograph, l stands for left, while r stands for right. "la" is unheard of. Then why exactly do you use such an annotation? I hope you don't repeat this error and actively correct instances as such. DistributorScientiae (talk) 20:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Taher Fakhruddin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Taher Fakhruddin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 06:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

admin banne ki kosish mat kar,kisi din samne mil itne jute maruga na sari hoshiyari nikal jaegi.Ramiericson (talk) 11:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't put Admin templates on my talk page

Dear Summichum, why are you posting templates on my page. These templates only suits to admin. Please refrain from such posts in future. And don't do distruptive editing on Mufaddal Saifuddin page. There is a main article for entering all "succession controversy" related information. Please don't disturb the article neutrality with your faith speech. Thank you.Ramiericson (talk) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mufaddal Saifuddin article

Hello, as a long-time contributor to this article, could you please take a look at the Mufaddal Saifuddin page and take a look at the edit history and make sure you think all the edits are fair. If anything stands out, please deal with as you think necessary. Thank you. Juzarbhai (talk) 06:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your previous edits, request you to please continue monitoring it as a user there is constantly trying to delete content and now accusing you of bias (he had accused me earlier too). Refer to Mufaddal Saifuddin edit history and talk page. If you look at Muffizainu's talk page you will also see that there is an established history of copyvio warnings and at least two instances of being warned of writing advertorial materials. Juzarbhai (talk) 20:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Juzarbhai (talk)Thanks you can file a complaint on the COI noticeboard with evdience on the person if he belongs to one partisan group and advocating on behalf of them :: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard

Juzarbhai (talk) FGM section added by you is being removed by partisan editors.10:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)10:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

June 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Immmmanuel (talk) 10:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mufaddal Saifuddin. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Immmmanuel (talk) 09:53, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]