User talk:Jimfbleak

Please add your message to the bottom of this page, give it a heading and sign it using four tildes ~~~~.

Someshwar Kohli

Hi, I want to create a page on Ugaoo.com. Earlier I have created one but due to few reasons my page has been deleted. Please let me know what I need to do if I want to recreate the same page. Someshwar Kohli (talk) 11:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user talk page Jimfbleak (talk) 13:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kazi Jakaria Rarcntv Riad

Hi, You said I need reference and something now I have reference public news paper and articles including google news.

you can check some news . journalist talk about me.

http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/2985916

So I want to create Kazi Jakaria Rarcntv Riad Page.

look the search result : https://www.google.com/search?q=ask.com+extor&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=Extor+launches

its all talk about me and my idea etc. so I want to create a wiki page. Let me know if I need any other thing.

My journalist will write a wiki page for me. I actually concern the reason you accept some studio name in wiki. where no valid source example link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogniroth_Studio . Those website also not a verifiable or physical newspaper. But my source is valid. such as ask.com Google news. abc, fox news. However. I believe if I submit right quality article you will accept it. Thanks

rarcntv (talk) 20:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user talk page Jimfbleak (talk) 05:43, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

rarcntv, what happens in other articles doesn't help you, your article will be judged on what you write. Please don't write about yourself Jimfbleak (talk) 05:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Texprt

Dear Jimfbleak, you have removed our External Link to TestifyingExpert.com on the Expert Witness topic. This site is directly related to the topic of this page and will be a necessary resource for anyone interested in this topic. Please explain why you have chosen to remove it. Thanks

Texprt (talk) 21:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)texprt[reply]

(talk page stalker)...Wikipedia is not a platform for you to advertise your business on. Try LinkedIn or Facebook. Cassianto^Talk 22:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Texprt, Cassianto (thank you) is exactly right. You say "a necessary resource for anyone interested in this topic", but necessary for your company is not the same as necessary for the project. As it happens, I know many expert witnesses, and they seem to get along quite well without your product.

Your user name, edits and the fact that you refer to yourself in the plural indicates that you are editing on behalf of a company, which is not permitted. If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for the company, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the company you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Texprt. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Texprt|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. I note now that your user name appears to be a violation of our user name policy, and the account will be blocked Jimfbleak (talk) 05:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also blocked two socks of this account Jimfbleak (talk) 06:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jimfbleak, very interesting response. However, if you are going to parade yourself as a legitimate representative of Wikipedia, maybe you shouldn’t utilize such bias when moderating. On this page which you seem to be guarding diligently, there is a commercial site linked that is very similar to the one I linked. Under the “See Also” section, you will find a page called “Expertpages” linked. This links to a Wikipedia page that is set up as an advertisement for ExpertPages.com. There is no other purpose for this page. Strangely, this advertising page has not been removed. I also noticed that you mentioned in your response that you ”know many expert witnesses”. Therefore, since ExpertPages.com is the only page that is linked under this topic, and you know many expert witnesses, it would obviously be a safe assumption that you are favoring or are associated with that site in some way. Your bias against our site and how you say experts “seem to get along quite well without your product” proves my point even further. The fact is, our site is still in development, and you have no idea what it will be offering and how it will help expert witnesses. I’ll just assume that you are interpreting the Wikipedia rules for your own benefit. According to you, people may not use Wikipedia for advertising, unless they have become a moderator solely for the purpose of promoting a product. If my assumption is inaccurate, before you go prancing around the page like a rooster in a henhouse, maybe you should actually look at the content of the page that you are defending. If my theory about your association with ExpertPages.com is accurate, you should be ashamed of yourself and you are exactly they problem. If that page is not removed, I will take that as a confirmation that my assumption is correct and that you are associated with that organization. In that case, you will be reported to an administrator. Your attempt to stifle me by blocking my account was cute, but blocking me to cover up your bias will not be tolerated.

UTRS appeal #16568

A user you have blocked has opened UTRS appeal #16568 on the Unblock Ticket Request System. The reviewing administrator, Mkdw (talk · contribs), has requested your input:

Dele 123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Time: Sep 22, 2016 01:17:00

Message: Jimfbleak, I've been reviewing the block and the editor meets the criteria for the standard offer. That being said, I do have concerns regarding a COI for Zoe Records. Even if I'm inclined to believe they're not an "employee", there are many types of COI and I have two concerns: whether the company meets our notability guidelines (WP:BEFORE does not look promising) and the other that I am not confident based upon the narrow interest this editor has with the company that they will write an unbiased article. I would be inclined to grant this editor the unblock request on the following conditions: restricted to a single account, may not edit around the topic of Zoe Records, and finally you endorse these terms for unblock. Regards, Mkdw ^talk 01:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

If you do not have an account on UTRS, you may create one at the administrator registration interface.
Alternatively, you can respond here and indicate whether you are supportive or opposed to an unblock for this user and your rationale, if applicable.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mkdw, thank you. I'm not optimistic, but I can't really object if the editor agrees to the conditions. Whether he/she sticks to them is another matter, given the determination with which they have pursued this topic so far. We'll see Jimfbleak (talk) 05:51, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Review

Jimfbleak Hope you're great his week!

I completely understand your busy schedule, and apology for distributing, I would like to make a small request to you for Draft:Perennial Math Can you please share feedback and review as all modifications are complete based on your guideline.

Waiting for your kind revert! Thanks Aankitmishra (talk) 06:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

please reply me

can you tell me why you deleted the page Qin Li-Wei. can you make an explanation, don't just deleted it. the extra link is about him. i saw a lot of pages do the same on their pages. why you deleted mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onejau9 (talk • contribs) 07:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Onejau9, thanks for your message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~.

Please read the nomination comments that Mike1901 posted on your talk page regarding promotion and copyright.
Note that if you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it.
Also note that you did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that he meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to him, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the he claims.
Don't remove speedy deletion notices

Jimfbleak (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquote

Hi, I would like to invite you to contribute to our sister project Wikiquote. Some articles there that may use more informative quotes include:

q:Zoo: Needs more quotes on Charismatic megafauna (example a quote which explicitly states their names, i.e. fills in the gap between "aardvark to zebra" (I added this quote) and their depiction on movies (example the Kung Fu Panda franchise for Giant panda).
q:Species: Needs a short succinct quote which explains nicely the discrepancy between the non-existence of Charismatic megafauna in invertebrates (including: insects, corals, mollusca, arachnids, crustaceans) and the comparatively larger ~1.3 million number of species compared to vertebrates.

Do let me know if you are interested in this. If you are uninterested can you consider pinging some folks in the reply message who can be potential contributors to Wikiquote. Solomon 7968 17:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clash with DD

Dear sir I had written an article named as CLASH WITH DD which seems to be deleted by you for a unexpected reason The organization has given me full authority to contribute it to wikipedia and it has been deleted on a emergency basis which is not fair please help me on getting my article back my article URL is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clash_with_DD please review it back and get me soon as possible on my talk page Tiven gonsalves 09:09, 23 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiven2240 (talk • contribs)

Replied on user talk page, unsourced spam for his own company Jimfbleak (talk) 10:22, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Jim	Talk	Contribs	Sandbox	Logs	Blocks	Deletions	Protections	Scripts	Bird talk	Commons