Talk:Volksverhetzung

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Germany Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Crime and Criminal Biography Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

sources

answers.com entry, reworded and expanded

This might be helpful to expand the article, I'm too lazy:

The law's German wording, non authoritative source
unhchr translation, use ctrl+F to find "Incitement of the people"

--Tickle me 21:07, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Incitement" is wrong. "Inciting" would be "aufhetzen", referring to the part of the populace X that got riled up against another part Y. "Verhetzen" means the defamation that leads to the riling up against populace part Y. So, if the german people got incited to hate jews, we would say the germans got "aufgehetzt", while jews got "verhetzt". --84.137.19.188 (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just og the message . that my talk was too personal It got removed .I thought talking about the jude sus ban was in talking about this artilce? mr think may 19 2010Mrthinky (talk) 22:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What changes do you suggest for the article? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I get the message. this discussion is about if the article needs improving. I understand it now, It doesn't need any changed, mrthinky may 18 2010 5:40pm cnt Mrthinky (talk) 22:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The word "popular" is incorrect, because in English it has a positive meaning, as in "that is a popular song" or "vanilla is the most popular ice cream flavor." A better translation of "Volks-," unless someone has a better idea, is "ethnic." The text of the law is broader than the title. Perhaps a better way to render "incitement of popular hatred" would be "ethnic defamation." KenWC (talk) 14:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The following sentence in the introduction:

The concept draws criticism by press and legal scholars [...] allowing in theory to punish nearly any political statment made and violating the freedom of speech.

references an article published in March 1960 that is hardly relevant any more. In the current form it implies widespread criticism of the law, which is evidently not the case. --141.70.99.109 (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History

I think this section should be deleted. I could not find the word Volksverhetzung in any of the Karlsbader Beschlüsse. Also, the Prussian Strafgesetzbuch from 1851 (http://koeblergerhard.de/Fontes/StrafgesetzbuchPreussen1851.pdf) does not use the term (it has 87:Öffentliche Aufforderung zu gesetzlichem Ungehorsam and 93:Störung der öffentlichen Ordnung). The Reichsstrafgesetzbuch of 1871 does have §130, but does not give it a title (http://lexetius.com/StGB/130,11).--Loewis (talk) 20:29, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]