Talk:Film
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Film article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
Film was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
To-do list for Film:
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Supernumerary 19:20, 20 January 2007 (UTC) The first movie theater in the world built only to show movies is the Vitascope Theatre (listed under Edisonia Hall because someone removed the direct reference. Opened in October 1896 it was designed only to show movies. The 1905 Pittsburgh Nickelodeon doesn't even come close! This needs to be fixed. |
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Film article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
Rating system
The MPAA was created in 1964 because many parents were aggressive by seeing Violence, Sexual content and bad words the film had. Here are the ratings
G (General Audiences) All ages admitted. This movie contains no content that would offend parents for viewing by children
PG (Parental Guidance Suggested) Some material may not be suitable for children. Some material may not be suitable for children. Parents are urged to give parental guidance as the motion picture contains some material that parents might not find suitable for their young children But a General suggestion is that movies with a PG rating may not be suitable for children under 108.
PG-13 (Parents Strongly Cautioned) Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13. Parents are urged to be cautious as the motion picture contains some material that parents might consider inappropriate for children under 13 years.
R (Restricted) Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian. People under 17 years may only be admitted if accompanied by a parent or guardian.
NC-17 (No One 17 and under admitted). This film is exclusively adult in content and people under 18 are not admitted.
For more information about the ratings see here: [1]
Sources that said PG carries an age limit of "10" which the MPAA didn't say: [2] [3]— Preceding unsigned comment added by The Amazing User (talk • contribs) 22:37,:38,:39, 2 October 2014
How to make page
Pls help i can t make page Muloge milmo (talk) 10:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 8 June 2016
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Need to add one movie site bhoothnike.com, please provide me permission for same.
Arumanketki (talk) 08:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - we do not add spamlinks to any article
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070407224839/http://www.cinemaweb.com:80/silentfilm/bookshelf/18_car_1.htm to http://www.cinemaweb.com/silentfilm/bookshelf/18_car_1.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19970122085113/http://imdb.com/ to http://imdb.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Change of title
This article is very complete about the USA Film Industry, I think that Film should be a more general article, about the film production in ALL the WORLD. Being this article linked to that general article about Film with the name of USA Film Industry History which per se is very extended, maybe also divided in articles about technical issues which lead to all the historical milestones, also the development of different cinematographic genders, and so on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.233.106.197 (talk) 22:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Actors and Actress
I would be interesting to note that the concept of a film or a show eludes the audience. It's almost as if it were never filmed at all. There is something missing. If you don't catch up with it, it's no problem whatsoever. Don't think everything has to be laid out for you.
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class filmmaking articles
- Filmmaking task force articles
- Core film articles supported by the filmmaking task force
- C-Class core film articles
- WikiProject Film core articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class Media articles
- Top-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
- Wikipedia articles that use American English