Jump to content

Talk:Jeremy Vine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 213.40.55.89 (talk) at 13:05, 31 January 2017 (→Daily Mail style of tabloid journalism - reference). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Religion

"Openly Christian" ..... is being a Christian on a par with being gay?

Openly, in that he "wears it on his sleeve", so to speak. Most broadcasters in the UK keep their religious views (if any) pretty much to themselves. Jeremy Vine is an exception, which I thought worth mentioning. --Bonalaw 12:39, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
""Openly Christian" ..... is being a Christian on a par with being gay?"

yes, it definitly is --Hexhunter 15:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now that IS a retarded comment!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.186.44 (talk) 00:59, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for cleanup

The sources need citing, the tone of voice needs to be cleared up badly and it also needs to be formatted correctly. Thank you. --///Jrothwell (talk)/// 14:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The tone of voice needs to be cleared up? In what way? It could use more criticism, but whenever anyone adds any, people from the BBC swoop in and remove it. -- 80.0.97.250 08:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

agree totally with 80.0.097.250 - I've had an edit removed from this "article" with the edit summary saying "removal of untrue material", which was not the case. :shrug: Vine's show is one of the few on Radio 2 that is guaranteed to make me turn the radio off, so who cares? 86.138.93.218 21:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I finally figured out who Vine reminds me of: Damien Day from Drop the Dead Donkey. He has that same strategy of calculatedly pushing the emotional angle whenever possible, knowing that mawkishness sells. --88.110.217.242 12:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Spot on... My goodness he's annoying, I have to listen to him at work... might have to look for some references on the net to see if it's relevant to add a critisim section.
The man is a nonsense-spouting moron. Direct quote from today's show: "Suzie Quatro's just walked in wearing a fantastic T-shirt. What does it say on it? It's a tiger? No wonder I couldn't read it." Not a trace of irony. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.255.214 (talk) 20:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By looks of the comments there has been no material cleanup since 2007. Many statements need citation.Peter.edelsten (talk) 21:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crap references section

I got rid of the ridiculous grammar note that someone put in the references section. And I wish these anonymous people would stop complaining. If you don't like his show then why are you so concerned by this article? Rupa zero 12:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a huge fan of diphtheria either, but if I see an error on that article then by jiminy I'm gonna change it. -88.109.95.39 12:09, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Is there really any point in having that picture there? Vine is such a small figure in the photo, you can't really tell what he looks like. -Q4 (talk) 10:57, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say it's better than nothing. We could always create another image from this one, by cropping everything but his head and shoulders - the resolution isn't that great, but it's recognisably him. Waggers (talk) 11:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Election coverage

The comment added about his appearance on BBC1 on the night of the council elections has been removed from someone on a BBC IP number. His performance was widely criticised everywhere, I think some mention should be made of this rather than just stating that he has replaced Peter Snow. --jmb (talk) 08:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Removing well-referenced content without discussion or even leaving an edit summary is vandalism, and I've treated it as such. Waggers (talk) 15:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This was removed again without any comment or explanation (I wonder if it came from a BBC IP again!) so I have put it back in the article --jmb (talk) 11:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This comment was removed again without any comment or explanation from someone at a BBC IP address. --jmb (talk) 20:29, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure it was a BBC IP address? - WHOIS says it's registered to Tiscali. Waggers (talk) 19:27, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It appears to be the same IP Address that has removed that section twice previously, 132.185.240.123. Traceroute shows [Reached Destination]webgw3.thls.bbc.co.uk. WHOIS shows BBC.
inetnum: 132.185.0.0 - 132.185.255.255
netname: BBC
descr: British Broadcasting Corporation
I think you were looking at a later edit by 88.109.202.222 --jmb (talk) 20:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, good spot. 08:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Marriage

I noticed the deletion of a reference to a previous marriage. I don't know anything about this but a quick check shows

Birth Q2 1965 Jeremy G. VINE Surrey Mid E registration district, mother's maiden name TILLETT
Marriage Sept 1992 Westminster registration district Jeremy G. VINE to a Janelie H. MUNTZ

I have no idea if this is the same Jeremy G VINE --jmb (talk) 01:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He takes callers, but only sparingly?

This claim made in the article doesn't really reflect what happens on air. I checked the reference given, and it's an article published before Vine took over the slot, on his plans for the show. I don't think it's appropriate to use that as a reference for what actually happened afterwards. --88.111.21.148 (talk) 11:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Mail style of tabloid journalism - reference

re: "Vine's broadcasting style has been likened to the Daily Mail style of tabloid journalism[5] in which a narrow range of subjects are repeatedly presented with the intention of exciting the audience and encouraging them to contact the program."

The reference does not make any comment about his broadcasting style - it merely documents one particular incident in which his radio show discussed the outlook of tabloid newspapers.

Is there any other reference for this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrong Arm (talk • contribs) 13:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Try listening to him now, it's all he does. Tedious repetition re MPs voting against Brexit in the commons. He's virtually telling his audience what to say. 213.40.55.89 (talk) 13:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Birthplace

The infobox says Epsom; the Personal background section says Cheam. Jim Michael (talk) 15:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ref says Epsom. Jim Michael (talk) 22:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This might be because if you live in Cheam, Epsom is your nearest maternity hospital Rjmunro (talk) 10:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And yet in Eggheads s16e96, he mentions being born in Los Angeles, California! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:21DD:AB00:AD9A:7621:2C39:7A2C (talk) 10:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

His birth is registered in Surrey Mid Eastern registraion district, so English birth (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QVWZ-CPRQ). His parents were married in 1964 also in Surrey (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QV67-TG22). Brother Tim Vine also born in Surrey (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QVWQ-6WZX) and sister Sonya also born in Surrey (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QVW6-35M2)
This source says: "They grew up in Northey Avenue, Cheam, and the boys went to Lynton Prep in Ewell and Aberdour School in Burgh Heath before going on to Epsom College." So suspect he was born in the maternity hospital in Epsom, but his home was in Cheam. Note the Tim Vine article says Tim was born in Cheam. Perhaps the two articles ought to be consistent? 20.133.0.13 (talk) 11:03, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Basketball career break

Just in case anyone is wondering about the surprising flurry of activity today and resulting review lock, it's all explained by this helpful edit which, we were informed by Vine on his lunchtime show, had been made as a deliberate prank by his BBC research team to test "how reliable Wikipedia is". Needless to say the material lasted a full week without being challenged, until some Wiki listeners, tipped off by JV himself, rapidly jumped in to expunge it. One immediately wonders what other gems the BBC (City of London IP 132.185.160.96) has been responsible for. Apparently Vine, at one time, thanks to this article, was alleged to have a particular penchant for eating sausage rolls, in world record time. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm one of the 32 watchers and I'd seen that edit on popups and thought that I'd have to go back and investigate but then forgotten all about it. Annoying. JMiall₰ 19:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Vandalism that poses as text, without expletives or obvious nonsense characters, is often a problem: even if one is watching an article, unless one is very familiar with the article subject matter, it's often a chore too far to investigate such edits by checking refs and doing google searches etc. Many times edits have made me think, 'I hope someone else looks into that because I can't be bothered...'. Wikipedia needs more subject experts generally. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 19:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, surprising that the research team didn't bother to throw in a few duff sources. I must admit if I'd seen that addition, supported by some hard-copy source such as Radio Times I'd have thought "how fascinating, but he is quite tall isn't he". In fact I'd probably have tried to correct that Manchester Giants syntax error! Martinevans123 (talk) 20:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jeremy_Vine&oldid=762924127"