User talk:Toddy1
|
|||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 24 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Wikibreak | Third opinion $220 | Chance ? | Mediation $220 | Arbitration $240 | Jimbo Wales $200 | In the news $260 | On this day $260 | MediaWiki $150 | Did you know $280 | You are banned! |
| RFA $200 | WIKIOPOLY | FPC $300 | ||||||||
| PERM $180 | POTD $300 | |||||||||
| Community discussion | Community discussion | |||||||||
| Editor review $180 | FAC $320 | |||||||||
| Developers $200 | Rouge admin $200 | |||||||||
| Deletion review $160 | Chance ? | |||||||||
| AFD $140 | TFA $350 | |||||||||
| Wikimedia Foundation $150 | Edit war (pay $100) | |||||||||
| CSD $140 | Main Page $400 |
|||||||||
WP:BANNED Just browsing | WikiProject Spam $120 | UAA $100 | Chance ? | AIV $100 | Admin cabal $200 | Teh Drahmaz (pay $200) | AN $60 | Community discussion | ANI $60 | Go Collect $200 salary as you pass  |
Trafalgar, etc
Could you take a look at England expects that every man will do his duty? I think the same conclusions that apply at Battle of Trafalgar apply there... Pinkbeast (talk) 22:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello
Please read WP:DTTR, and do not post alerts, or anything for that matter, on my talk page again. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 20:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but there are times when I have to place notices on other editors' talk pages whether they like it or not.
- If I make a report to them on one of the administrators noticeboards, e.g. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
- If you are have done 3 reverts in 24 hours, and I plan to take you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring if you do a fourth, then someone needs to place an edit-warring warning on your page; which is the action you are complaining about.
- -- Toddy1 (talk) 21:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Unless required by policy, of course. I obviously do not intend to break the three-revert rule, though I am disappointed that you would insist that a screenshot from YouTube is superior to an actual photograph, apparently for the purposes of making a point. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 21:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- I genuinely believe that the old photo is greatly superior to the new photo.-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Unless required by policy, of course. I obviously do not intend to break the three-revert rule, though I am disappointed that you would insist that a screenshot from YouTube is superior to an actual photograph, apparently for the purposes of making a point. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 21:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Hey, wanted to say thanks for your excellent layout of what these users were doing. Had this been one user operating under a typical username, I probably would have thanked them for the work they had done. But seeing two accounts with very troll-ish usernames making such rapid edits raised my suspicion. Thanks for sorting it out. Home Lander (talk) 19:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- It was a very odd case.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- I myself am wondering about their motive. They seemed to be an editor in good standing; other than recently being told that a question they posted at an RfA was apparently stupid, I'm not sure what went wrong. Home Lander (talk) 20:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Cindy and Co
You beat me, I was just collecting evidence for a SPI. I looked at their global contributions and found [1]. H1N111 is a globally locked SP of ELreydeEspana. However, ELreydeEspana operated IP´s from Guatemala; these socks seem to be related to Maltese IP´s. JimRenge (talk) 11:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Please could you add what you have found to the SPI.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
It should be in your User: space not User talk, but I trust you'll be moving it shortly. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- It is moved to the articles with a year number in Category:Mid Bedfordshire District Council elections.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:16, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Notice (regarding Russo-Georgian War)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Showing electorate/registered electorates
Hi. Not sure whether you're subscribed to watch the Politics of the United Kingdom talk page, so just though I'd give you a heads up that I'd suggested a potential way of displaying electorates for local authority elections, by placing it below the ward name. I'd be greatful for your input. Ballotboxworm (talk) 16:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)