User talk:Wisdomtooth32

Welcome!

Hello, Wisdomtooth32, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 04:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Realist Left

Hello, Wisdomtooth32,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Realist Left should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realist Left .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Owlsmcgee (talk) 08:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure… I sure feel "highly encouraged". What's the hurry, Owlsmcgee?? I barely finished a first cycle of edits. Wisdomtooth32 (talk) 09:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Realist Left

Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Wisdomtooth32, thanks for creating Realist Left!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 09:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks. Wisdomtooth32 (talk) 09:59, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm Alpha3031. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to CNN seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Alpha3031 (talk | contribs) 04:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, so I've done the same on Alex_Jones_(radio_host)'s page, User_talk:Alpha3031. — Wisdomtooth32 (talk) 05:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:POINT, please. Neutrality^talk 05:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, extensively discussed, with many editors asking the very same question, and ignored. Added my support there in the discussion for actual Neutrality. — Wisdomtooth32 (talk) 05:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's down right adorable that you think this is going to work. I suspect you are doing this to be blocked so you can have some sort of badge of honor by sticking it to us nerds, but it's only wasting time. You're only wasting your own time. --Tarage (talk) 00:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sticking it to us nerds?? o.0
What makes you think I'm not a nerd too? Do all nerds have the same views on everything? Who exactly are you talking about? — Wisdomtooth32 (talk) 00:52, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You are blocked for 31 hours to give people a rest from your aggression. Please take the time to read WP:MASTODONS. Guy (Help!) 00:29, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DRN case closed

This message template was placed here by Nihlus, a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. You recently filed a request or were a major party in the DRN case titled "Talk:Alex Jones_(radio_host)". The case is now closed: please see the case commentary for the specific reason. If you are unsatisfied with this outcome, you may open a thread on another noticeboard as appropriate. If you have any questions please feel free to contact this volunteer at his/ her talk page or at the DRN talk page. Thank you! --Nihlus 17:43, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comments by volunteer: Additionally, the avenues you have explored in the single month you have been on the wiki are highly suspect.

It appears that a Request for Comments that you filed about Alex Jones is still open, and that you should have known that using DRN to re-argue an issue that has been recently addressed or is still being addressed in an RFC is deprecated. Such tendentious editing will almost always result in a reputation as a stubborn editor and may result in sanctions (such as your recent block). Pause and reconsider whether your approach to Wikipedia is doing any good either for you or for Wikipedia. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:34, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It hadn't been addressed. My DRN was not for admins to settle the dispute in the Talk page, but simply to enforce Wikipedia policy that articles whose neutrality is being disputed ought to be appropriately POV tagged for the benefit of readers. I was unfairly blocked, having courteously argued my view, while being repeatedly met with WP:UNCIVIL behaviour both in Talk:Alex Jones_(radio_host) and in noticeboards by what seemed to me to be a mob Wikiactivists hell-bent on disqualifying anyone who didn't agree with them, including Alex Jones and anyone who might advocate giving him a neutral and objective description. You're right about this not "good for me", as Wikipedia does seem in the thralls of a mob ruled by groupthink. Whether that's good for Wikipedia is whole other matter entirely. — Wisdomtooth32 (talk) 00:50, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Alex Jones (radio host). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Your comment was "Or you just don't want to draw attention, lest more editors drop by to have their say too? The level of mob-like tyranny here is really something! — " Doug Weller talk 19:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Ok, retracted the last sentence (though I was attacked plenty in that discussion, and that is my honest opinion, not about people in particular, but about the ethos that is prevailing at Wikipedia). — Wisdomtooth32 (talk) 21:09, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mean to cause trouble. But, you only half retracted. About the first sentence, please read WP:AGF. O3000 (talk) 21:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's a question, not a statement. Feel free to answer, if you like. I did assume good faith, but you and others proved me wrong. I don't anymore; not from you. — Wisdomtooth32 (talk) 23:50, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Defamation League

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Anti-Defamation League, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:36, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do NOT roll back my contributions simply because you disagree with the criticism being exposed. If you don't think it's adequately sourced — although the content is consistent with the film's article itself! — it suffices to include a ^{[citation needed]} tag. Right now you're vandalising. This is your last warning. — Wisdomtooth32 (talk) 04:42, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]