Jump to content

Talk:Rainbow Loom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 166.107.111.254 (talk) at 23:34, 1 February 2018 (→‎Correction needed?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconToys C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Contested deletion

Speedy declined because it doesn't meet A7's criteria: it's not about the "company, corporation or organization", but about the product. Was actually about to PROD this. Ansh666 04:18, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UK fad status?

It appears that "Loom Bands" have reached fad status according to this linked BBC News article[1]

I think that this popularity should be reflected in the main article to reflect the international status of the loom band.--TGC55 (talk) 11:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, this is looking a bit US-centric otherwise. Have added it to the "Reception" section. --McGeddon (talk) 11:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I had to listen to at least 30 minutes, this morning, about the dangers of "Loom Bands" on a BBC London 94.9, so I thought it certainly merited a mention.--TGC55 (talk) 13:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correction needed?

The opening/intro paragraph states the loom was invented in 1981, but the article clearly states it was in 2010. I'm not able to log in, so I'm just suggesting someone might want to correct that line.