Jump to content

Talk:Vegetarianism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Betty Logan (talk | contribs) at 05:56, 6 July 2018 (→‎Survey). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 9, 2006Peer reviewReviewed

Template:Vital article

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Halepenyo (article contribs).


Religion - Hinduism

According to Hindu-Buddhist philosophy, using pesticides in field crops cause many animals to be killed, probably more so than all meat eaters combined. Clearing large areas for crops also causes hardship to many animals who are displaced as a result of this. Being vegetarian does not mean that no animals have been killed in cultivating crops and any ethical arguments to support this perception does not hold up.[1]

Vegetarianism has also led to possible displacement of the Indus Valley civilization to the east (Bihar) and/or may have merged with an older settlement there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.98.10.54 (talkcontribs)

References

  1. ^ "To Cherish All Life [buddhanet.net;". buddhanet.net. 1982. Retrieved October 1, 2014.

Geoffreyrabbit, I reverted the gallery section. Per WP:Gallery, we usually do not include galleries. I also do not see why a gallery is needed or is an improvement for this article. I'll also go ahead and note that we do not have a gallery at the Veganism article either. I ask you to take the time to discuss this here on the talk page instead of revert and re-add the gallery. On a side note: Per MOS:HEAD, the section should not have been titled "Vegetarian Gallery"; it should have simply been "Gallery." Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:50, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think to collecting the vegetarian picture in gallery , I just want to said that collect all pictures in there , I don't know why you removed it from the wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geoffreyrabbit (talkcontribs)

Geoffreyrabbit, you have not justified including the gallery. I also sense a language barrier, but you seemingly included the gallery simply because you like it. I've started an RfC on the matter below. We will see what others have to state about it. You can vote below. Remember to sign your username using four tildes. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 13:13, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The dispute concerns Vegetarianism#Gallery. One view is that we usually do not include galleries, per WP:Gallery, which is also why there is no gallery at the Veganism article, and the gallery does not appear needed. The other view is that a collection of vegetarian diet pictures in a gallery is an improvement. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 13:13, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

  • No. Galleries can be nice or fun to look at it, but they usually are not needed and they often grow out of hand, as can be seen, for example, at the Blond article (its "Historical cultural perceptions" section). There were a lot more pictures there than is seen now, but they were reduced after the excessive pictures were complained about. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 13:13, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • No Obviously there is such a wide range of vegetarian food that a gallery in this case is simply decorative. It has no encyclopedic value whatsoever. Betty Logan (talk) 05:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Yes, I think Vegetarianism is have gallery to collect the all vegetarian food or about the vegetarianism picture is set in gallery , So I think vegetarian is other Wikipedia article is have gallery to collecting the same photographs in gallery . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.40.137.197 (talk) 05:11, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]