Jump to content

Talk:Astroworld (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pyeatt99 (talk | contribs) at 13:41, 3 August 2018 (→‎NC-17: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAlbums Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Requested move 30 July 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. WP:SNOW closure. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Astroworld (Travis Scott album)Astroworld (album) – There isn't another Astroworld album, so the specific artist identifier isn't necessary. Limmidy (talk) 22:32, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong Support – I don't see why this is controversial, if anything it should be at "Astroworld" and we could have a hatnote for the former Six Flags park. JE98 (talk) 00:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I also think somebody should consider asking an admin to combine the page history of Astroworld (album) when/if it is moved. Ss112 05:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per above. No other album with the same name. Hayman30 (talk) 05:30, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I think the creation of the article with this name was unintentional anyway; merge with history. Ninjinian (talk) 11:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. as per JE98. TOMÁSTOMÁSTOMÁSTALK⠀ 05:22, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Honestly could have been sent to noncontroversial requests. Clearly the right option. Sock (tock talk) 07:06, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

NC-17

There’s a young thug feature on NC-17 Pyeatt99 (talk) 13:41, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]