User talk:Krimuk2.0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 125.214.51.223 (talk) at 07:59, 20 August 2018 (→‎August 2018). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

Thanks

Hi, just wanted to drop by to thank you for all the updates to "my" articles. I appreciate it. FrB.TG (talk) 14:02, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I enjoy keeping articles of my favourite performers up-to-date and more importantly, I know you're not the kind to mind. :) --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:04, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How have you been my friend? Great work on Vicky Kaushal and all the other articles you have worked on recently. Wikipedia is lucky to have an editor like you. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 20:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why, thank you, R! I wish more people recognised my value. Haha. ;) --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
People don't recognize your value because you're ANMOL! :) BTW do you think it would be wise to separate Kapoor's career post 2015 or even motherhood (more so, the former)? I noticed that a while back you removed the heading "decrease in workload" from the article. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 20:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I didn't really agree with the "decrease in workload" bit because she has been consistently working post-marriage. She's still one of the biggest stars in Bollywood and her output equals that of her male and female contemporaries. Anyway, if you want to separate her work post 2016 then that's fine but I don't find it particularly necessary. Maybe in a year or two, when Good News, Salute, and some of her other films release, we could have a "2018 onwards" subsection. What do you think? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:49, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good! -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 02:54, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for what you introduced: "For those of you unfamiliar with the lovely Amy Adams, I hope that reading this article makes you exclaim, "Now that's a proper introduction!" The biography of a perfect lady must be perfect, and I look forward to all the help I can get in giving Miss Adams her next shiny star."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:50, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Publisher field

After seeing your recent edit on Vidya Balan, this is what I wanted to tell you. As per Template:Cite web, "Do not use the publisher parameter for the name of a work (e.g. a website, book, encyclopedia, newspaper, magazine, journal, etc.)." That is why the "website" parameter exists. Please do not forget this. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:16, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The main reason why the "publisher" field is used instead of "website" is due to the default italic formatting in the latter parameter. Sites like "Bollywood Hungama", "Rotten Tomatoes", etc are not to be italicised, and hence the website parameter is not used by many of us. --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the way "Rotten Tomatoes" and other such website references are formatted in Lady Gaga's article (an FA not written by me). --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to use non-italics in "website" parameter, you can use the {{noitalics}} template, but that just seems unnecessary. FrB.TG (talk) 21:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Manikarnika Poster.jpg

⚠
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Manikarnika Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --John (talk) 07:16, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wish

Hello. Help improve article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thank you. 125.214.51.223 (talk) 07:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Krimuk2.0&oldid=855705806"