Jump to content

Talk:Daniel J. Callaghan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 192.158.48.90 (talk) at 12:36, 7 September 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleDaniel J. Callaghan has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2010Good article nomineeListed

September 2009

For Clarityfiend: I wrote, "It was while serving aboard this ship that Callaghan first met Ross McIntire, a surgeon, who would later have a significant effect on the former man's career." In this context, "former man" refers to Callaghan, just as "latter man" (if I had used that phrase) would refer to McIntire. One could also have used "first man" to indicate Callaghan and "second man" to indicate McIntire. Just a comment to clarify, since you seemed puzzled. Janggeom (talk) 05:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have rewritten the article over the past few days, expanding it and providing more references. I have also included a reworked photograph of the subject (in the infobox) that shows much more detail than the earlier version. Janggeom (talk) 10:21, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to Admiral Callaghan's story?

Being unfamiliar with the Guadalcanal story and Admiral Callaghans death there, I could not find it anywhere in Wikipedia in the past. Then it appeared, finally people could see how he fought and was killed in battle. Then when I went back to read it again, someone removed it. People want to know the story. Who ever deleted Callaghans story, please put it back.

As noted in the edit history, the edits were recognised as good faith edits, but they also inserted a large amount of content about the Naval Battle of Guadalcanal that takes the focus off Callaghan's life. This article is about Callaghan, not the battle. The battle has its own article, and has been recognised as a Featured Article—an article that represents an example of Wikipedia's best. The article on Callaghan contains links to the article about the battle at appropriate places. Looking back at the inserted content again, I notice also that it appears to have been taken directly from a book by J. D. Hornfischer (2011). While quoting limited sections of text is acceptable, quoting an extensive amount of text could potentially constitute a copyright violation, and in any case is not preferred (Wikipedia is not a media repository). To address a specific point:
Request you revert circumstances regarding Callaghan's death. The information is about Callaghan. German Admirals Scheer and Hipper bios have far more "battle" details than Callaghan's article has. Revert those, or retain Callaghans.
I do not believe this makes a sound argument on Wikipedia. One could turn around and say, "Go through every single military biography on Wikipedia and ensure that they all contain the same level of detail." Articles are independent. Just because one article has a certain level of detail does not mean that other articles must have the same. The main concern is that Wikipedia articles follow Wikipedia guidelines. As a suggestion, one thing that might be helpful is to write a summary of the battle, which could then be inserted into this article. Please note that, in all of this commentary, I write simply as one contributor to another. Thank you. Janggeom (talk) 05:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article states: "By order of President Roosevelt, both Rear Admirals Callaghan and Scott were posthumously awarded the Navy version of the Medal of Honor." While indeed the MOH awarded to members of the different services (Army, Navy, and Air Force) are physically somewhat different in detail, they are all the same award for valor. The qualification would appear to be doubly odd as it is unlikely he would have been awarded the Army or (had it existed at the time) Air Force MOH. By comparison, the wiki article for RAdm. Scott just specifies that he was awarded the MOH without further comment as to it being the Navy version.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Daniel J. Callaghan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Daniel J. Callaghan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Daniel_J._Callaghan&oldid=858471649"