Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Omaha Hotel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Jonesey95 (talk | contribs) at 08:13, 12 October 2018 (Fix Linter errors using AutoEd). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Omaha Hotel's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:00, 30 April 2013 (UTC).

Omaha Hotel

[edit]

Moved to mainspace by Chris857 (talk). Self nominated at 20:51, 21 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Article meets core policies and guidelines of the DYK criteria, long enough, neutral, cites sources with inline citations and appears to be free of copyright violations and plagiarism. Hook fact is accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article. Article should be ready for displaying on the main page, well done!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:54, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
I think a QPQ needs to be done before this can be get a green tick? SagaciousPhil - Chat 12:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
I also assume we're going with the original hook? ALT1 is hardly unusual; in fact there are many properties much older than that when they get listed. Daniel Case (talk) 23:34, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
I have started my QPQ review. Chris857 (talk) 18:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, restoring Dr Blofeld's approval tick. SagaciousPhil - Chat 18:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)