Jump to content

Talk:Liv Hewson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ChiveFungi (talk | contribs) at 12:01, 2 November 2018 (→‎Liv Hewson is gay). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconWomen Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

February 2017

There's been some edit warring recently over whether Hewson is an "actor" or "actress", because Hewson indicates a preference for gender neutral pronouns on personal twitter and instragram profiles. There's also been fighting over the inclusion of these categories. In my opinion, I think "actor" would be just fine, but I can understand why this might confuse the average reader, and as far as I know there are (recent) reliable sources coming out referring to Liv Hewson as an "actress". The last thing I want to do is cause WP:HARM, as someone who's misgendered all the damn time, I get how frustrating it can be, I really do. I wish I knew what the correct thing to do in this situation is, because I *know* it isn't unique. Just can't think of another example right now. It would be interesting if Liv Hewson themself could give their thoughts on the issue. I don't think IP's get pings but just in case this works: @71.217.89.7, 73.140.248.10, 201.103.35.158, 2001:980:eee0:1:30ac:48ca:504b:d04, and 75.170.57.1: Sro23 (talk) 08:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This recent tweet seems to resolve things. Sro23 (talk) 04:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

According to Liv Hewson, she is one of all Australian residents who started acting in 2013. Her breakout role is the Netflix television series, Santa Clarita Diet.

Keep the closed case in mind. Rectify 54 14:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter as source

User:Atlantic306: Where does it say that Twitter is WP:RS for "uncontroversial information"? Even if the subject uses "us" and them" pronouns that doesn't mean that WP has to adopt this formulation and referring to them by their surname is perfectly acceptable and not contrary to their gender identification. Mztourist (talk) 03:08, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:RSN if you search the archive under twitter shows that is acceptable for some information and the MOS:GENDERID says that they pronouns should be used if the subject uses them, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 10:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See also WP:SELFSOURCE. --ChiveFungi (talk) 12:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Liv Hewson is gay

Liv Hewson is gay.They have said so many times. I am not sure what certain users problems are with gay people, but it sure is weird.R.A Huston (talk) 12:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There need to be multiple independent high-quality reliable sources for this kind of claim about her. Twitter and abeautifulperspective.com are not obvious reliable sources.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:28, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Twitter is appropriate for some information per WP:SELFSOURCE. However without secondary sources, it's hard to establish whether them being gay is a notable fact. If you'd stop edit warring and baselessly accusing people of homophobia for one second we could discuss whether it's relevant to include in the article. --ChiveFungi (talk) 12:01, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]