Jump to content

User talk:Longhair

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Smylesarebetterthanfrowns2018 (talk | contribs) at 06:04, 7 November 2018 (→‎Feedback: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

hi re my adjustment Neal Murry i didnt provide source as the article contradicts itself ie places Neals birth as ...... Victoria Australia while claiming their origin as Pupunya in Northern Territority Australia obviously one can't be from two places? Neal does not make any claim to be indigenous Australian so references to his aboriginality are also inaccurate.

I would be interested to know what references are provided to substantiate Meals origins and aboriginality?

Thanks

User talk:All online shopping BD

You may wish to revoke the talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 08:04, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks. -- Longhair\talk 08:07, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:TheMcShittlesAreAPooSandwich

You may wish to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 08:11, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moser

Before erasing because I do not know where you are coming from I put the precision of the pilot look is not true https://hscc.org.uk/championships/historic-formula-2/historic-f2-drivers / you know how to read--88.138.58.202 (talk) 13:37, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Longhair, the IP 88.138.58.202 is a sock of cross-wiki LTA user De la lombertie. 'Cheers, Loopy30 (talk) 17:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).

Administrator changes

added Pbsouthwood • TheSandDoctor
readded Gogo Dodo
removed Andrevan • Doug • EVula • KaisaL • Tony Fox • WilyD

Bureaucrat changes

removed Andrevan • EVula

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus that the {{promising draft}} template cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a WP:G13 speedy deletion nomination.

Technical news

  • Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
  • Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon () in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.

Miscellaneous

  • Currently around 20% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 17% a year ago. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless if you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block on User:ActualSamuelLJackson

Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

Turns out it actually was him. He was recording a video for the YouTube channel GQ, apparently. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kln_SgDD9Nc&t=2m43s — Gestrid (talk) 19:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Zaid

Yeah, I edited Mark Zaid's page to let whistleblowers know he's a honeypot. You deleted it because it lacks a 'source.' You know very well my associates don't reveal sources and methods. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.118.199.62 (talk) 03:21, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whelp... no reliable source, no edit then... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

Hi! Are you a Wikipedia administrator? I would kindly ask you if also users like me Can revert contents. I have Just noticed someone deleted a piece I wrote about Ronnie Radke with silly motivations as It was widely documented and properly cited with references(so there is nothing "skanted" in the Truth). As this happens very often cause of haters and vandals and very annoyed ti rewrite pieces everything ,is there a way ti simple directly revert It? Thanks for your atttention. Nazaria 73 (talk) 06:12, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can use the undo button or Twinkle if you are autoconfirmed. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 06:18, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Trilogy terrorSEDVD.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trilogy terrorSEDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sock master is back

Sorry to bother you but the sock master who was previously blocked by you [1] has started same type of editing again. SPI is still in progress against them. Can you please look into it again?-Kishfan (talk) 09:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Telecommunications Industry Ombudsan

Hi - thanks for your message about the typo, sorry I didn't see it sooner. I've now made the change to the typo in a new page, and updated it a little bit. I hope I've done this correctly, thanks again for helping. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billybrooks1980 (talk • contribs) 09:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).

Administrator changes

added Sro23
readded KaisaL • Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news

  • After a discussion at Meta, a new user group called "interface administrators" (formerly "technical administrator") has been created. Come the end of August, interface admins will be the only users able to edit site-wide JavaScript and CSS pages like MediaWiki:Common.js and MediaWiki:Common.css, or edit other user's personal JavaScript and CSS. The intention is to improve security and privacy by reducing the number of accounts which could be used to compromise the site or another user's account through malicious code. The new user group can be assigned and revoked by bureaucrats. Discussion is ongoing to establish details for implementing the group on the English Wikipedia.
  • Following a request for comment, the WP:SISTER style guideline now states that in the mainspace, interwiki links to Wikinews should only be made as per the external links guideline. This generally means that within the body of an article, you should not link to Wikinews about a particular event that is only a part of the larger topic. Wikinews links in "external links" sections can be used where helpful, but not automatically if an equivalent article from a reliable news outlet could be linked in the same manner.

Technical news

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Subject: Block on User:Mareike at Röchling

Dear Longhair, I have some trouble with my account User:Mareike at Röchling. I will tell you the whole story: At first I used my account User:Röchling-Gruppe, which was originally from the German Wikipedia. I didn't know the account’s name was against the English username policy. I'm sorry for my mistake. (But I am convinced that my changes in Röchling Group were not spammy. Could you please have a second view on the text? No other editor complained about my changes.) After this trouble I created the new, verified account User:Mareike at Röchling to follow all Wikipedia guidelines from now on. But when I tried my first changes on an article this account was temporarily blocked too, because of using the same IP-address. How can I get out of this? It would be very kind if you could help me. Best regards, Mareike at Röchling (talk) 07:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Asterion • Crisco 1492 • KF • Kudpung • Liz • Randykitty • Spartaz
renamed Optimist on the run → Voice of Clam

Interface administrator changes

added Amorymeltzer • Mr. Stradivarius • MusikAnimal • MSGJ • TheDJ • Xaosflux

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a "stop-gap" discussion, six users have temporarily been made interface administrators while discussion is ongoing for a more permanent process for assigning the permission. Interface administrators are now the only editors allowed to edit sitewide CSS and JavaScript pages, as well as CSS/JS pages in another user's userspace. Previously, all administrators had this ability. The right can be granted and revoked by bureaucrats.

Technical news

  • Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour.
  • Some abuse filter variables have changed. They are now easier to understand for non-experts. The old variables will still work but filter editors are encouraged to replace them with the new ones. You can find the list of changed variables on mediawiki.org. They have a note which says Deprecated. Use ... instead. An example is article_text which is now page_title.
  • Abuse filters can now use how old a page is. The variable is page_age.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has resolved to perform a round of Checkuser and Oversight appointments. The usernames of all applicants will be shared with the Functionaries team, and they will be requested to assist in the vetting process. The deadline to submit an application is 23:59 UTC, 12 September, and the candidates that move forward will be published on-wiki for community comments on 18 September.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:SacredHeartBendigo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SacredHeartBendigo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —innotata 00:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Samuel L Jackson user page.

You blocked this user: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ActualSamuelLJackson but they are actually a representation of Samuel L Jackson's opinion by GQ Magazine here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kln_SgDD9Nc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Livitshiro (talk • contribs) 22:37, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Livitshiro: Doesn't matter. See WP:IMPERSONATE. General Ization Talk 22:40, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).

Administrator changes

added Justlettersandnumbers • L235
removed Bgwhite • HorsePunchKid • J Greb • KillerChihuahua • Rami R • Winhunter

Interface administrator changes

added Cyberpower678 • Deryck Chan • Oshwah • Pharos • Ragesoss • Ritchie333

Oversight changes

removed Guerillero • NativeForeigner • Snowolf • Xeno

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial blocks should be available for testing in October on the Test Wikipedia and the Beta-Cluster. This new feature allows admins to block users from editing specific pages and in the near-future, namespaces and uploading files. You can expect more updates and an invitation to help with testing once it is available.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team is currently looking for input on how to measure the effectiveness of blocks. This is in particular related to how they will measure the success of the aforementioned partial blocks.
  • Because of a data centre test, you will be able to read but not edit the Wikimedia projects for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, amended the procedure on functionary inactivity.
  • The community consultation for 2018 CheckUser and Oversight appointments has concluded. Appointments will be made by October 11.
  • Following a request for comment, the size of the Arbitration Committee will be decreased to 13 arbitrators, starting in 2019. Additionally, the minimum support percentage required to be appointed to a two-year term on ArbCom has been increased to 60%. ArbCom candidates who receive between 50% and 60% support will be appointed to one-year terms instead.
  • Nominations for the 2018 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission are being accepted until 12 October. These are the editors who help run the ArbCom election smoothly. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please consider nominating yourself.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial blocks is now available for testing on the Test Wikipedia. The new functionality allows you to block users from editing specific pages. Bugs may exist and can be reported on the local talk page or on Meta. A discussion regarding deployment to English Wikipedia will be started by community liaisons sometime in the near future.
  • A user script is now available to quickly review unblock requests.
  • The 2019 Community Wishlist Survey is now accepting new proposals until November 11, 2018. The results of this survey will determine what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year. Voting on the proposals will take place from November 16 to November 30, 2018. Specifically, there is a proposal category for admins and stewards that may be of interest.

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors will be invited to nominate themselves as candidates in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 4 until November 13. Voting will begin on November 19 and last until December 2.
  • The Arbitration Committee's email address has changed to arbcom-en@wikimedia.org. Other email lists, such as functionaries-en and clerks-l, remain unchanged.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1st draft content

Hi, I am new to Wikipedia and I am trying it out. I want to share how to run a successful business for new business owners. I was hoping to save the page rather than publish the article.

Sorry for the error.

Sslimptc (talk) 09:33, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Response to edit query

Hi Longhair. I would need to know exactly which page you're referring to to give un explaination, but I'm certain that I wouldn't have made nonsensical changes. I should, however, have certainly provided an appropriate summary of my edit an dfor that I apologise. Which page are you referring to? Codenameflowerboy (talk) 11:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) This edit ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 11:36, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Here is a kitten. I just wanted to send you one.

EnglandUser (talk) 11:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Longhair,

I am contacting you regarding your notes about the external links recently added to the page of Oliver Griffin which you have apparently deemed inappropriate and removed. I fail to see how providing further information about the artist's published work and referring to his publisher official website is inappropriate. Could you explain, please?

Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IsabelMarkus (talk • contribs) 12:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@IsabelMarkus:, take for example the link you were adding, loosejoints.biz. It's an online gallery, offering art for sale by many artists. It's spam. -- Longhair\talk 12:32, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Longhair: The links referred to the relevant published projects on the official website of the publishing house Loose Joints which is the artist's publisher - not an online gallery. This is certainly not a spam. Could you please rectify this mistake? -- IsabelMarkus\talk 12:53, 4 November 2018 (GMT)
You linked to the main page of Loose Joints, not any particular works from this artist. I see many artists works offered at the main page and only a handful of Oliver's works in the catalog. My opinion stands. It's a commercial site, ie, spam. -- Longhair\talk 12:58, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Longhair: I understand this might be a problem for the external links section but why was the entire list of published work removed when these were only linked to the relevant web pages?-- IsabelMarkus\talk 13:08, 4 November 2018 (GMT)

Stopping my Wikepedia Page

Respected Sir, 

Sir I want u to know that I am not using wikepedia as a soapbox.I am not using it for promotional purposes.I am just adding my information as some people wish for it.I am also a music producer and i have made two songs and the third is yo be uploaded soon.I just want to add my biography like the Dj s and therefore I have created my page.And I am a new user to Wikepedia and therefore I am repeatedly editing it as I Dont know how to properly publish it.Hope you understand my problem Sir.

Thanking You, Rajdeep Dutta — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajdeepdutta516 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rajdeepdutta516: Self promotion is not permitted at Wikipedia. Please take a read over the information I've left at your talk page relating to conflict of interests. Thanks. -- Longhair\talk 13:53, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, Ok sir,now I understood what u want to explain.Sir but if i dont upload my information on my own nobody can upload it because i am not so famous right now.Therefore me myself I am uploading my biography.Sir I know giving self information is prohibited but still can u help me with this matter as some of them want to know about my Info.Therefor I am repeatedly doing this.Sir I am begging u to not stop my page to be published.Even I have some songs in music platforms also I hope u will understand my feeling and will not stop my page to be published Thanking You Yours Faithfully, Rajdeep Dutta — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajdeepdutta516 (talk • contribs) 14:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removed link to http://empichon72.free.fr/revues/byte/sommaires_byte.php on byte magazine page

Hello Longhair, The link you removed has the same purpose as "HomeLib On-line index for early issues of Byte" (second external link in byte magazine page) but on articles level. It contains an index of all articles published in Byte Magazine and available in "archive.org" (first external link in byte magazine page). It offers direct links to over 12,000 Byte magazine articles. It is complementary to other external links in byte magazine page. I've read guidelines about links (neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding, non commercial, english language, ...) and I think that the link you removed is appropriate for wikipedia. Hoping to contribute to the wikipedia project. Regards, Empichon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Empichon (talk • contribs) 16:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Empichon: With the title of the subdomain being almost identical to your username, this smells strongly of self promotion. -- Longhair\talk 17:02, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i was meaning to make an edit but accidentally deleted one of the brackets on the code. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmail user 0729 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Longhair: The link contains only byte magazine content (cover and summaries) and a neutral presentation page. It is not a question of personal promotion but of a work of volunteer archivist. The sole purpose is to facilitate the search for information and access to archive.org. Empichon (talk) 17:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Peters

Could you please protect Marcus Peters because it is being repeatedly vandalized and was reported to RFPP a long time ago. CLCStudent (talk) 03:02, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CLCStudent: Done. -- Longhair\talk 03:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

David Mobley (entrepreneur)

It's always concerning when someone's official webpage links to their Wikipedia article [2]. I'll keep on cutting down on the fancruft. Thanks for the thanks . HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HickoryOughtShirt?4: I thank you because it's people like you who walk in and clean up the mess I found. May I ask what the hell is up with that air freshener mention? Does the subject have some kind of relationship with that product or is there spamming of unrelated articles occurring? I admit I've only just cleaned up the surface and not yet read anything in detail, but I am watching. -- Longhair\talk 05:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The editor added that Mobley made air fresheners here. I removed it here. It was originally on Mosbey's page but I removed. [3] HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

/* Hindi Versions */

Hi, I strongly protest your judgement. The links I added are relevant to the subject. Please, explain why the links are spam or advertising. Wikipedia promotes ideas and a link to a non-profit page could not be considered unconstructive. Jorgewiki57 (talk) 10:36, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re comment

You're probably right, as I have a distinct feeling that we are being trolled. 331dot (talk) 11:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Which is why I just called it out. I've smelt enough bullshit here previously to know when I'm standing right beside it :D -- Longhair\talk 11:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Protection for persistent vandalized page

Brother, I think the page about Vallabhbhai Patel should be protected. That Novorapid guy is creepy with his vandalism act :< — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abubakaraltholib (talk • contribs) 13:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Abubakaraltholib: Done. It's been going on for a while. -- Longhair\talk 13:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clarens, Free State

Hi, please review your decision regarding my external links. They are relevant, and are updates to several of the references cited in the article. Information is up to date and important. If you disagree, no problem, but please consider or let me know why they aren't acceptable. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClarensAccom (talk • contribs) 13:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Atlantic306. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Mamun Al Nattah, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Atlantic306 (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not here?

Hello. I see that you recently blocked Olmacdeieio per WP:NOTHERE. I notice similar patterns in Special:Contributions/Gerbliy and Special:Contributions/StellaTanna; perhaps there are more. Certes (talk) 19:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Certes: Yes, there are more. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Saren555 and feel free to update that list should you find them. My block log is kinda long of late. -- Longhair\talk 23:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet blocks

Hi Longhair! I hope life has been treating you well! I noticed that you've made a good number of blocks on some accounts under sock puppetry today (for example: MYLIFEIS122333444455555666666). Are they all controlled by the same sock master or same user? What makes them similar that you know right away that they're sock puppet accounts? Is there an SPI report open? I'm just curious about it and would like to take a further look - just let me know when you can. Thanks, and good hunting! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah:. Many vandals have a pattern or signature as you already know. The ones I am marking as a sock are those I recognise so I can refer back later when asked to compile a list etc. I'm blocking far too many in a hurry of late so it's my way of grouping similar attacks under the same banner so to say. A common one is the one using numbers in his username as you've used as an example above. -- Longhair\talk 01:29, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, fine by me. Just curious to see who the master is. Let me know when you file the SPI for these cases; I'd like to take a look at them. Cheers ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:ReElectReaganfor2020

Hey Longhair. I saw this username blocked as an organization by you. I can't help but think it's actually a joke considering how long Reagan has been gone. By the way, thanks for all your frequent admin work, appreciated. Home Lander (talk) 01:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Home Lander: Ha. Both sides can have a laugh hey>? Clearly it's a prank, so I thought I'd return the joke and block it as promotional :D -- Longhair\talk 01:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Heh heh. I did a double-take when I saw it crossed-out in the newusers list. Home Lander (talk) 01:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wonder if Special:Contributions/JohnAdamsIsHip is related... 🤣 Home Lander (talk) 01:58, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rajdeepdutta516

I agree with your block on this user for sure, but I'd consider if blocking the user indefinitely is the right solution compared to a 31 hour block. It's clear based off the user's edits, deleted contribs, and the username to match them that he's clearly here to promote himself - and it's highly likely that this is the user's main and only purpose. It's your call of course, but I figured I'd message you, weigh in, and give my two cents. Cheers ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: First block and all... some learn, some don't, and when they don't, that's when I deliver the final blow. -- Longhair\talk 06:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I got'cha. Cool deal - figured I'd just weigh in. Cheers! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:49, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: Check his unblock notice... profit? Where's my $5 for time wasted? :D -- Longhair\talk 06:49, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Uh oh... *Oshwah goes and takes a look* (lol) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:02, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: Fair decision too. Fancy labeling me the problem? (as they do) :D -- Longhair\talk 07:03, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, that's what I tend to see with users in the same exact situation who request an unblock. They think they deserve a page about themselves despite Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, they don't care to follow the rules nor read about Wikipedia's fundamentals and principles and respect them, and those who get in the way of their main (usually only) objective to write about themselves are obviously wrong and are just after them to give them a hard time - hence they blame the blocking admin (in this case, you). There are people out there who just don't want to be helped and would rather do things the hard way (or sometimes the uncivil or unpleasant way)... we can only help them as much as they want to be helped. *Shrug* ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:10, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: Sigh. Oh I know the type well... -- Longhair\talk 07:13, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
LOL. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:13, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

Hello, thank you for the feedback on my profile. Any future criticisms are welcomed and much appreciated. (This is the right way to respond?)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Longhair&oldid=867665646"