User talk:Maury Markowitz
Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or drop me a line. BTW, I like what you have done to the place. Cheers! --maveric149
Nomination of Mailplane (software) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mailplane (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mailplane (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk)
DYK nom needs attention
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Comments at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/GL Mk. I radar
Hello Maury, this is just to notify you that there are unaddressed comments at your A-class nomination Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/GL Mk. I radar. The article is fairly close to promotion if those comments could be addressed. Thanks, Kges1901 (talk) 23:54, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- There are still unaddressed comments left. If these are addressed the article can be promoted. Kges1901 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Kges1901: I believe they have all been addressed. I see no new entries since my last post? Maury Markowitz (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- There isn't anything below your last post, yes, but there are still AustralianRupert's initial comments at the top of his comments section about uncited paragraphs. Kges1901 (talk) 00:17, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Everything in that section was addressed. The uncited sections were either cited or removed. Maury Markowitz (talk) 00:33, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Kges1901: Actually it wasn't, but it is now. Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:05, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing the top two bullets, but the last still does not appear to have been addressed, as of the latest revision. Kges1901 (talk) 01:19, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Kges1901: I believe they have all been addressed. I see no new entries since my last post? Maury Markowitz (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, which is "the last"? Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:01, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- the entire paragraph ending: In the immediate post-war era, these were in turn replaced by the smaller and lighter AA No. 3 Mk. 7 radar, which remained in use until AA guns were removed from service in the late 1950s. Kges1901 (talk) 14:38, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Now that that has been fixed, I would like to inform you that there is still one more issue in the image review. Kges1901 (talk) 12:23, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Violet Friend
On 20 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Violet Friend, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the UK's Violet Friend anti-ballistic missile system was designed to use Bloodhound anti-aircraft missiles (example pictured) and radars to lower its cost? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Violet Friend. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Violet Friend), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Maury Markowitz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Organic nuclear reactor at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 18:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
Disambiguation link notification for December 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CN Newmarket Subdivision, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collingwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
ZETA (fusion reactor) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the ZETA (fusion reactor) article has been scheduled to be rerun as today's featured article for January 25, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 25, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
We also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors on the day before and the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:16, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Ames Type 80
The "Master Radar Station layout" section in this article is unreferenced. Please fix as the article is due to go to the main page, thanks. Gatoclass (talk) 19:13, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
@Gatoclass: all fixed. looks like I didn't save and edit. Maury Markowitz (talk) 21:29, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- I saw that Maury. Nice work, thank you! Gatoclass (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- I've just come across the article. Great work Maury and thanks for writing it.
DYK for AMES Type 80
On 14 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article AMES Type 80, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Royal Air Force thought that Green Garlic was very good indeed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/AMES Type 80. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, AMES Type 80), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.