Jump to content

User talk:Wallyl22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) at 09:01, 18 December 2018 (Substing templates: {{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Invitation}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Wallyl22/sandbox (December 18)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joel S. Schuman (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joel S. Schuman (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
j⚛e deckertalk 21:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joel S. Schuman (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

Worldbruce (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Wallyl22, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Worldbruce (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Wallyl22, and thank you for your email. I assume you're talking about Draft:Joel S. Schuman (you also have versions of the page on your user page and your sandbox page, which can create confusion - my advice is to remove the text from those places if isn't your latest work).

After the draft was declined on 5 October 2014, nothing happened for a while. You made a number of changes on 23 April 2015 (including deleting the text of the previous reviews [the stuff marked with the comments <!-- Do not remove this line! -->], which is also where the resubmit button is). That may explain why you didn't indicate that you were ready for another review by resubmitting it. In any case, that's why no one has commented on, reviewed, accepted, or declined it. To the volunteers at Articles for creation it looked like you were either still working on it or had abandoned it.

Another editor restored the text of the previous reviews on 16 June 2015. If you're ready for another review, all you need to do is click the blue resubmit button in the big pink box at the top of the draft. The good news is that the queue of pending submissions is shorter now than at any time in the past year, so much so that you might receive a review within a matter of days. It won't be from me because I make it a practice not to review a draft twice. This gives submitters the benefit of a fresh look from a reviewer who may have different strengths.

I'm sorry if the whole edit/review/resubmit cycle has been confusing and time consuming, but I hope this explanation gives you the information you need to move forward. Worldbruce (talk) 00:15, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Joel S. Schuman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joel S. Schuman. Thanks! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:37, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joel S. Schuman has been accepted

Joel S. Schuman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]