Talk:Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Star Wars Start‑class High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

United States: Cinema Unassessed Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Mark Hamill confirms appearance?

Here's the source. Whats your thoughts on this? Npamusic (talk) 23:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Hamill as Luke Skywalker

Is it confirmed that Hamill returns as Skywalker? It doesn't seem to be mentioned in the announcement. Only that he is in the cast. Not especially serious, just that his character is supposedly dead. Alaney2k (talk) 22:55, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Being dead isn't a show stopper in the context of the Star Wars universe. GimliDotNet (talk) 18:19, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Star Wars Episode 9.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:52, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Skywalker saga

So we seem to have avoided the use of the term "Skywalker saga" in the leads of all the original and prequel trilogy articles, as well as The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi. Myself and others have continuously reverted the many IPs who have added "the final installment of the Skywalker saga" to this article, even though some sources describe it as such. The wording was recently added again by an actual registered editor, UpdateNerd, who has contributed to many Star Wars articles, so I thought it was time to open a discussion about its use here. I personally think it reads a little fanboyish, since I don't believe the series is thought of as "the Skywalker saga" in the mainstream. I wouldn't mind, however, something in the Development section establishing that this film has been described as "the final installment of the Skywalker saga", with some context for non-fan readers about what this means. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 16:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm all for avoiding it in the lead, except maybe within a note to help explain what is meant by "the main Star Wars film franchise". I think it mostly makes sense to use in context, such as Star Wars#Standalone films, where it's used to distinguish the anthology from the main series. UpdateNerd (talk) 18:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

In my opinion it's time to give this article semi-protected edit status since it gets vandalized or pointlessly adjusted on a near-daily basis by unregistered users. Anyone else? UpdateNerd (talk) 06:47, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding every character not in this film

Taking this to the talk page for discussion for a hope to avoid an edit war because surely we can not keep adding characters to the current films that are not in that production - in this case Episode 9?

"The late" should not be used and adding both Han Solo & Darth Vader constantly to the article is simply excessive clutter and both are currently (until we learn the plot) irrelevant to the article.

The only time Han Solo should be mentioned is the article in the cast list regarding Kylo Ren.

In the line for Lando Calrissian - Solo is gone and the only characters in the film that know of him are Luke, Leia, Chewbacca, C3PO & R2D2.

Adding The grandson / grandfather info to the cast list about Darth Vader is excessive as he died back in Episode 6 and now we are on 9.

Any responses on this subject would be welcome.

Regards

Juanpumpchump (talk) 14:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU for opening this discussion. I totally agree that namedropping Han and Darth Vader constantly through the cast list is unnecessary clutter. Also, we don't refer to real-world people as "the late XX" in our biographical articles, so we should not do so for fictional characters. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 15:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, is there a MOS guideline saying that we shouldn't "the late" when referring to the deceased? To me it seems to depend on the context. UpdateNerd (talk) 00:05, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, otherwise there would be literally millions of Wikipedia articles all starting with the late" and fictional or not it is not really relevant.

Juanpumpchump (talk) 07:34, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, I was certainly not implying it should always accompany the name of anyone who has died. It depends on the context. UpdateNerd (talk) 07:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, cool, I was not looking at starting either an online argument or an edit war so please don't take any offence to my previous reversions.

However, on the Todd Fishers reversions, which fisher died she was not married and legally meant that all decisions regarding Carrie Fisher's remains and her estate unless their was was Will or Lasting Power of Attorney by law immediately fall to her daughter Billie.

So in that case is there any way that the article (with your input) could be reworded?

Juanpumpchump (talk) 08:16, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't take anything as an argument; I just can't help but respond to conversations on my watchlist. :) As far as the Billie Lourd rewording, I think the current version actually reflects your interpretation of events. While I'm not an expert of law (and a posting a source supporting your claim here would be welcome), I just made sure to attribute the revealing to Todd, and the legal action to Fisher's daughter. Does it seem to look right in the article now? UpdateNerd (talk) 09:28, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rey - The Last Pupil of Luke Skwyalker

The article states that Rey is the last pupil of Luke Skywalker. This is verifiably false. Kylo Ren was trained under the tutoriage of Luke Skywalker as mentioned in both the prior two films. Additionally in The Last Jedi Luke references "a handful of students" who went away with Kylo who's fate is unknown however they very well could be alive making Rey not only the second last pupil of Luke but also perhaps not even that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.50.136.96 (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused by your logic; I think last is meant to mean the last one before Luke "died", not the last remaining pupil alive.— TAnthony^Talk 19:31, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New title

The new film title is not sourced now. This should be done soon before before people try to back to Star Wars: Episode IX. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:19, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here are two sources above. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ian McDiarmid

is now listed in the cast at IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2527338/fullcredits/?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm 165.225.50.178 (talk) 18:09, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]