Jump to content

User talk:MDPMHG

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MDPMHG (talk | contribs) at 10:28, 6 July 2019 (→‎Unblock request: Added sorry and accepting). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi MDPMHG! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:54, Wednesday, June 26, 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Hello, I'm Aranya. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Shruti Seth. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Aranya (talk | contribs) 04:52, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Edward Harwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John
Philip Furneaux (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Henry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Hello @ST47: I'm not a sockpuppet account sir MDPMHG (talk) 07:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think that you are User:AR.Dmg, which means that you have created a new account in order to evade a block. Denying this will not be helpful. If you want to appeal, there is Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks, and you would type {{unblock|1=**your explanation here**}} at the bottom of this page. However, be aware that repeatedly making false unblock requests can result in loss of your ability to edit this page, and it is generally recommended that you return to your original Wikipedia account to discuss the unblock there. ST47 (talk) 08:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MDPMHG (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not using multiple accounts for misusing Wikipedia. I'm a genuine editor. I can do anything to prove my authenticity. I don't know vc4137 or either AR.Dmg because of whom I have been blocked. I request to look into the matter and assist me to prove myself innocent. I do assure you, and I admit I'm not doing any harm to Wikipedia. And I do anything to get myself unblock. As you said I'm AR.Dmg Ok sir I accept my mistake. I don't want to hide my mistake. I agree with you. I can cheat. But the system won't. Sir I'm a genuine editor please give a chance to prove myself. I know I had been blocked due to sock puppetry and using multiple accounts. I will take the charge of my account for which I have block. Do give me a chance to rectify mistake sir. I won't do it again and would not create havoc. I am aware of Wikipedia policy and I will abide my them MDPMHG (talk) 08:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you admit you are AR.dmg, you will need to return to that account to request to be unblocked; that's going to be difficult since you first denied it. Likely your only pathway to being unblocked is the standard offer; no edits or socking for six months. Even then, you will need to address your attempts to evade your block and your efforts to be dishonest with us. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:46, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@MDPMHG: I do have some questions for you. Feel free to answer here or back on your original account:
  1. Can you please tell us, as well as you can remember, all of the Wikipedia accounts that you have used?
  2. Your recent edits on Sanjivani and KSK seem to have met some resistance. For each of those articles, do you know why other users reverted your edits? Is there anything you could have done other than revert back?
If you are willing to follow Wikipedia's guidelines and policies, it is possible to be unblocked, potentially under the standard offer that 331dot mentioned. Potentially sooner, especially since it looks to me that you are trying to constructively work on articles rather than continue with the same thing that led to your original block. However, we need to understand that you will work with other editors in the future, and follow the policies, guidelines, and community consensus in your editing, rather than create sockpuppets and use edit warring. ST47 (talk) 09:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MDPMHG (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello @ST47: sir as you asked questions. I would definitely like to answer all questions before you unblock me.
  1. As you asked how many account do I have used or remember. I have starting Wikipedia using Vivek Chourasia, Vivek Chourasia vc4137 and Vc4137. But during that time I was in school and was immature don't know much about Wikipedia. So I did many mistakes I accept that I have been warned many times. I won't hide anything from Wikipedia community. I created the first 4 account as I was immature. Don't know much about Wikipedia. But from the past account AR.Dmg I was working in contributing Wikipedia, and was trying to follow Wikipedia policy. You can contact @Cyphoidbomb:. As I was taking assistant from sir about guidance If I do something wrong through my edit. He also guide me to don't do edit warring and discuss it on the talk page. I had lost all the access of my previous account sir, I accept my mistake that I was immature I was involved in sockpuppets and edit warring previously. I will rectify my mistake if I get the change. The first four account was loged in a cell which has been destroyed in an accident. And my AR.Dmg was blocked from editing so I can't request from there. As with the new account MDPMHG, I promise to accept my mistake and I will acknowledge all my accounts in these account. And I can assure u that I won't repeat my mistake which I used to do previously like sockpuppets, edit warring or being rude with ip user. I will abide by the Wikipedia guidelines and policy
  2. the second question Sanjivani and KZK. I accept that I missed mos and infobox of television which I didn't followed properly. I shouldn't revert the edit. But I should discuss with my fellow editor about my edit if they revert it and if their edit summary doesn't justify it. And also thanks them if my guide me and help contribute Wikipedia.
At last I would like to say that I am going to take the ownership of all my account and would mention it if I get unblocked. I will definitely follow the Wikipedia guidelines and policy and would not repeat it again, I have understood why I have been block from editing Wikipedia. It a Encyclopaedia which everyone refers and so we need to neutral point of view to create good article and as @331dot: sir said about Wikipedia:Standard offer. I will totally rectify each of my mistake which I had done till now sir. I know I had been dishonest at first, I'm extremely sorry for that. I would not do this again. Thanks for your consideration. MDPMHG (talk) 10:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Hello <span class="template-ping">@[[User:ST47|ST47]]:</span> sir as you asked questions. I would definitely like to answer all questions before you unblock me. ::# As you asked how many account do I have used or remember. I have starting Wikipedia using [[User:Vivek Chourasia|Vivek Chourasia]], [[User:Vivek Chourasia vc4137|Vivek Chourasia vc4137]] and [[User:Vc4137|Vc4137]]. But during that time I was in school and was immature don't know much about Wikipedia. So I did many mistakes I accept that I have been warned many times. I won't hide anything from Wikipedia community. I created the first 4 account as I was immature. Don't know much about Wikipedia. But from the past account [[User:AR.Dmg|AR.Dmg]] I was working in contributing Wikipedia, and was trying to follow Wikipedia policy. You can contact <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]]:</span>. As I was taking assistant from sir about guidance If I do something wrong through my edit. He also guide me to don't do edit warring and discuss it on the talk page. I had lost all the access of my previous account sir, I accept my mistake that I was immature I was involved in sockpuppets and edit warring previously. I will rectify my mistake if I get the change. The first four account was loged in a cell which has been destroyed in an accident. And my [[User:AR.Dmg|AR.Dmg]] was blocked from editing so I can't request from there. As with the new account [[User:MDPMHG|MDPMHG]], I promise to accept my mistake and I will acknowledge all my accounts in these account. And I can assure u that I won't repeat my mistake which I used to do previously like sockpuppets, edit warring or being rude with ip user. I will abide by the Wikipedia guidelines and policy ::# the second question Sanjivani and KZK. I accept that I missed mos and infobox of television which I didn't followed properly. I shouldn't revert the edit. But I should discuss with my fellow editor about my edit if they revert it and if their edit summary doesn't justify it. And also thanks them if my guide me and help contribute Wikipedia. At last I would like to say that I am going to take the ownership of all my account and would mention it if I get unblocked. I will definitely follow the Wikipedia guidelines and policy and would not repeat it again, I have understood why I have been block from editing Wikipedia. It a Encyclopaedia which everyone refers and so we need to neutral point of view to create good article and as <span class="template-ping">@[[User:331dot|331dot]]:</span> sir said about [[Wikipedia:Standard offer]]. I will totally rectify each of my mistake which I had done till now sir. I know I had been dishonest at first, I'm extremely sorry for that. I would not do this again. Thanks for your consideration. [[User:MDPMHG|MDPMHG]] ([[User talk:MDPMHG#top|talk]]) 10:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Hello <span class="template-ping">@[[User:ST47|ST47]]:</span> sir as you asked questions. I would definitely like to answer all questions before you unblock me. ::# As you asked how many account do I have used or remember. I have starting Wikipedia using [[User:Vivek Chourasia|Vivek Chourasia]], [[User:Vivek Chourasia vc4137|Vivek Chourasia vc4137]] and [[User:Vc4137|Vc4137]]. But during that time I was in school and was immature don't know much about Wikipedia. So I did many mistakes I accept that I have been warned many times. I won't hide anything from Wikipedia community. I created the first 4 account as I was immature. Don't know much about Wikipedia. But from the past account [[User:AR.Dmg|AR.Dmg]] I was working in contributing Wikipedia, and was trying to follow Wikipedia policy. You can contact <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]]:</span>. As I was taking assistant from sir about guidance If I do something wrong through my edit. He also guide me to don't do edit warring and discuss it on the talk page. I had lost all the access of my previous account sir, I accept my mistake that I was immature I was involved in sockpuppets and edit warring previously. I will rectify my mistake if I get the change. The first four account was loged in a cell which has been destroyed in an accident. And my [[User:AR.Dmg|AR.Dmg]] was blocked from editing so I can't request from there. As with the new account [[User:MDPMHG|MDPMHG]], I promise to accept my mistake and I will acknowledge all my accounts in these account. And I can assure u that I won't repeat my mistake which I used to do previously like sockpuppets, edit warring or being rude with ip user. I will abide by the Wikipedia guidelines and policy ::# the second question Sanjivani and KZK. I accept that I missed mos and infobox of television which I didn't followed properly. I shouldn't revert the edit. But I should discuss with my fellow editor about my edit if they revert it and if their edit summary doesn't justify it. And also thanks them if my guide me and help contribute Wikipedia. At last I would like to say that I am going to take the ownership of all my account and would mention it if I get unblocked. I will definitely follow the Wikipedia guidelines and policy and would not repeat it again, I have understood why I have been block from editing Wikipedia. It a Encyclopaedia which everyone refers and so we need to neutral point of view to create good article and as <span class="template-ping">@[[User:331dot|331dot]]:</span> sir said about [[Wikipedia:Standard offer]]. I will totally rectify each of my mistake which I had done till now sir. I know I had been dishonest at first, I'm extremely sorry for that. I would not do this again. Thanks for your consideration. [[User:MDPMHG|MDPMHG]] ([[User talk:MDPMHG#top|talk]]) 10:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Hello <span class="template-ping">@[[User:ST47|ST47]]:</span> sir as you asked questions. I would definitely like to answer all questions before you unblock me. ::# As you asked how many account do I have used or remember. I have starting Wikipedia using [[User:Vivek Chourasia|Vivek Chourasia]], [[User:Vivek Chourasia vc4137|Vivek Chourasia vc4137]] and [[User:Vc4137|Vc4137]]. But during that time I was in school and was immature don't know much about Wikipedia. So I did many mistakes I accept that I have been warned many times. I won't hide anything from Wikipedia community. I created the first 4 account as I was immature. Don't know much about Wikipedia. But from the past account [[User:AR.Dmg|AR.Dmg]] I was working in contributing Wikipedia, and was trying to follow Wikipedia policy. You can contact <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]]:</span>. As I was taking assistant from sir about guidance If I do something wrong through my edit. He also guide me to don't do edit warring and discuss it on the talk page. I had lost all the access of my previous account sir, I accept my mistake that I was immature I was involved in sockpuppets and edit warring previously. I will rectify my mistake if I get the change. The first four account was loged in a cell which has been destroyed in an accident. And my [[User:AR.Dmg|AR.Dmg]] was blocked from editing so I can't request from there. As with the new account [[User:MDPMHG|MDPMHG]], I promise to accept my mistake and I will acknowledge all my accounts in these account. And I can assure u that I won't repeat my mistake which I used to do previously like sockpuppets, edit warring or being rude with ip user. I will abide by the Wikipedia guidelines and policy ::# the second question Sanjivani and KZK. I accept that I missed mos and infobox of television which I didn't followed properly. I shouldn't revert the edit. But I should discuss with my fellow editor about my edit if they revert it and if their edit summary doesn't justify it. And also thanks them if my guide me and help contribute Wikipedia. At last I would like to say that I am going to take the ownership of all my account and would mention it if I get unblocked. I will definitely follow the Wikipedia guidelines and policy and would not repeat it again, I have understood why I have been block from editing Wikipedia. It a Encyclopaedia which everyone refers and so we need to neutral point of view to create good article and as <span class="template-ping">@[[User:331dot|331dot]]:</span> sir said about [[Wikipedia:Standard offer]]. I will totally rectify each of my mistake which I had done till now sir. I know I had been dishonest at first, I'm extremely sorry for that. I would not do this again. Thanks for your consideration. [[User:MDPMHG|MDPMHG]] ([[User talk:MDPMHG#top|talk]]) 10:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}