Jump to content

Talk:CIA activities in Cambodia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 172.242.133.107 (talk) at 16:48, 9 August 2019 (This article should be deleted: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconUnited States: Government Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconCambodia Start‑class
WikiProject icon CIA activities in Cambodia is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]
WikiProject iconEspionage Start‑class
WikiProject iconCIA activities in Cambodia is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kreino1 (article contribs).

Suggested style guide for this article

See Talk:Central Intelligence Agency/Country Article Style Rules

Were the Khmer Rouge communist?

I tried editing the article twice to say the Khmer Rouge were communist. The article on Khmer Rouge says they were communist but I've been reverted twice by someone who says they were socialist. Nowhere in the article on Khmer Rouge does it say they were socialist. Raquel Baranow (talk) 23:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As explained before: they did indeed consider themselves as communists, but their regime can't be said to be so. It was socialist. It's a socialist state, not a communist one. If you read more about Marxist theories, you would probably understand it better. Also, I don't see the reason why you need to mention this. Why do you need to mention this? Both the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the People's Republic of Kampuchea were also ruled by communist parties, so I see no point in mentioning it in the section this way. --Te og kaker (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1967 section

Nixon was not sworn in as President until 1969; he brought Kissinger with him. So why are they in the 1967 section?—DocWatson42 (talk) 11:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be deleted

There is no real justification for this article existing. Its a random timeline of events. Its more of an archive than an article. It would be best to delete it, but I'm not interested in wasting the time to do it. 172.242.133.107 (talk) 16:48, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]