Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Celette

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Celette

Tendentiously resubmitted native advertising for a non-notable company. Declined as an advert, then again as non-notable. When DGG rejected it in April, he also warned the submitter against trying to use Wikipedia for advertising. To a subsequent question at the AfC Help Desk, I reiterated the problems with notability and sourcing. Nevertheless, the author has resubmitted it with the same passing mentions and non-independent sources. My own searches of the usual Google types turned up nothing longer than two sentences in independent reliable sources. Worldbruce (talk) 00:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, and considering the utter unlikelihood of an article on the company which makes a bench for car repair shops, possibly salt both the draft andthe potential article. (I do not know if we have ever done that, or perhaps we should wait until yet another try) DGG ( talk ) 00:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DGG, I refuse to write on your ridiculously large talk page. Yes, I have more than once done pre-emptive protections. See Anslin for a recent one. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This wouldn't need deleting if the author had left it alone after the rejection, but the author is continuing to edit, which prevents G13. Salt with Extended-Confirmed so that a neutral editor can work if appropriate. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertising. Geolodus (talk) 12:16, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt per nom. I don't see how this is any more of a WP:MILL business. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and it should be noted that the author is trying to circumvent the debate by prematurely asking for undeletion at REFUND. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^Bori! 21:01, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PARENT is a disambiguation page. I think you meant to link to WP:OTHERPARENT. Geolodus (talk) 07:08, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.